Teams

Racketeers

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 4.18 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-09-16vs PTSALost 02
L#1 DoublesRilee Moorhead / Mark Phillips vs Suzanna Murali / Pratap Murali3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaryann Moorhead / Jeff Buckingham vs Hanna Jacobs / Zachary Fohn2-6, 3-6
2022-09-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Bill Sharp vs Oleksandra Ivanova / Kirk Porritt2-2
2022-09-01vs PTSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesRilee Moorhead / Mark Phillips vs Erin Peterson / Mark Rice6-3, 6-0
2022-08-30vs PTSALost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Madelyn Reid / Robert Miranda1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Becky Caven / Steven Caven1-6, 3-6
2022-08-26vs TennisityLost 02
L#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Vicki McBride / Noe Lopez4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDawna Buckingham / Jeff Buckingham vs Indranil Roy / Yuzhu Zheng3-6, 2-6
2022-08-25vs TennisityWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Chad Anderson / Debbie Wachtell6-1, 6-2
2022-08-18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Oleksandra Ivanova / Spencer Woods2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Dawna Buckingham vs Rachel Kincheloe / Trever Browne1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRilee Moorhead / Mark Phillips vs Kerri Porritt / Sam Elsethagen0-6, 4-6
2022-08-16vs ETC Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Emily Flores / Gregory Johnson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-09vs PTSDWon 20
W#2 DoublesMike Buckingham / Michelle Phillips vs Soo Kang / Jayme Sullivan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Dana Gross / Jeremy Canning3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Get Your Shot Together11129718236
2PTSA102251126254
3ETC Backhanded Compliments66201640330
4Racketeers57142249359
5PTSD01272965411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.37
Rachel Moorhead
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Nick Wilson
published 4.5
4.21
Mike Kirby
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
published 4
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Jeff Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rilee Moorhead2747% games+1.2% vs expected
Diana Gastanaga + Mike Kirby151049% games−2.4% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Nick Wilson2642% games−2.9% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rachel Moorhead81050% games−3.2% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Rilee Moorhead5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham282253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Rachel Moorhead
49W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Nick Wilson
42W–34L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Mike Kirby
241W–106L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jeff Buckingham
50W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Phillips
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
42W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.