Teams

Suntree - Saunders

2024 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-04vs Viera Regional Park - BleauWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Christina Carver vs Tanya Molony / Stephanie ODonnell6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Fischer / Sandra Rowe vs Iliana Bleau / Shelly Rosseau5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSARA BRESETTE / Sharon Ford vs Karen Kelly / Susan Wilkes6-3, 7-5
2024-07-23vs Desoto - ThessenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Christina Carver vs Jennifer Thessen / Sylvia Segura7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMandy Smith / Sharon Ford vs Denise Stanley / Jennifer Mitz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Ford / SARA BRESETTE vs Peg Casey / Suzanne Taylor6-7, 1-6
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Yvette van der Wiel vs Dena Grayson / Mary McCarthy6-1, 6-2
2024-06-30vs Viera Regional Park - BleauSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNancy Fischer / Dana Saunders vs Cuc Nguyen / Iliana Bleau0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMandy Smith / Darien Lawrence vs Xu Sue Huang / Susan Wilkes6-4, 7-6
2024-06-16vs Desoto - ThessenLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Ford / Mandy Smith vs Denise Stanley / Altair Watson3-6, 4-6
2024-06-09vs EFSC - TaylorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Christina Carver vs Marlee Miller / Ela Krebs6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSacha Armstrong / Sharon Ford vs Suzanne Taylor / Peg Casey0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Brooke van der Wiel vs Kimberly Turner / Marcia Lusk2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSARA BRESETTE / Sacha Armstrong vs Marilyn Scott / Liz Lamb7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Christina Carver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Amira Tolles
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.70
Yvette van der Wiel
published
3.58
Amy Gregory
published 4
3.45
Lee Harrington
published
3.35
Sandra Rowe
published
3.24
Veronica Scott
published
3.24
SARA BRESETTE
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Saunders
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Fischer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Sharon Bean
published
3.15
Darien Lawrence
published 3.5
2.99
Sacha Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Mandy Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amira Tolles + Christina Carver11262% games+9.9% vs expected
Nancy Fischer + Mandy Smith3745% gamesnot enough data
Sacha Armstrong + Mandy Smith5165% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Fischer + SARA BRESETTE3345% gamesnot enough data
SARA BRESETTE + Amira Tolles4262% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Rowe + Nancy Fischer044 matchesnot enough data
SARA BRESETTE + Christina Carver404 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Rowe + SARA BRESETTE213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Carver
101W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Amira Tolles
91W–33L career · 11 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Yvette van der Wiel
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Amy Gregory
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lee Harrington
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sandra Rowe
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Veronica Scott
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
SARA BRESETTE
102W–75L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Fischer
67W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Sharon Bean
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Darien Lawrence
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Sacha Armstrong
42W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mandy Smith
90W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.