Teams

Brevard/Turner/Trilevel18&Over4.0/3.5/3.0W

2024 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-04vs Desoto - ThessenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Linda Stout vs Katie Husty / Terry Taylor6-2, 6-3
2024-07-28vs EFSC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesXiaolu Yin / Marcia Lusk vs Marlee Miller / Carol Becker7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Wadsworth / Karen Tedder vs Jane Bonvillain / Kimberly Kressler6-3, 7-5
2024-07-14vs Viera Regional Park - BleauSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Linda Stout vs Heather Schleicher / Gillian Dionne7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDena Grayson / Karen Tedder vs Iliana Bleau / Deena Helton6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-30vs Desoto - ThessenLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary McCarthy / Katie Lipman vs Cynthia Simmons / Stephanie Tran6-7, 5-7
2024-06-23vs EFSC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Turner / Xiaolu Yin vs Marlee Miller / Stacy Wagner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Boyd / Katie Lipman vs Kimberly Kressler / Emily Dwyer6-3, 6-4
2024-06-09vs Viera Regional Park - BleauWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcia Lusk / Xiaolu Yin vs Naomi Coleman / Stephanie ODonnell6-4, 6-1
2024-06-02vs Suntree - SaundersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Turner / Marcia Lusk vs Amira Tolles / Brooke van der Wiel6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Marcia Lusk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.69
Xiaolu Yin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Leslie Love
published
3.24
Sonja Waterman
published
3.19
Cheryl Wadsworth
published 3.5
3.13
Katie Lipman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lucina Currie
published
Karen Tedder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Turner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Liz Lamb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Turner + Xiaolu Yin3250% gamesnot enough data
Marcia Lusk + Xiaolu Yin213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Lipman + Xiaolu Yin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marcia Lusk
74W–74L career · 9 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Xiaolu Yin
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.28
Sonja Waterman
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
Cheryl Wadsworth
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Katie Lipman
27W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lucina Currie
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.78
Karen Tedder
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Turner
38W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Liz Lamb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.