Teams

MIL:Bobbi's Beasts:DeAngelis

2024 ECT Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-23vs LS:55& 7.0 Mixed:AshLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Lange / Steven Sax vs Roisin MacKey / Scott Soderberg3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Haven / Richard Hoin vs Robert Gay / Sherri Storms7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaggie Nava / Ray Cerritelli vs Patricia Conway / James Craffey5-7, 6-7
2024-06-09vs LS:55& 7.0 Mixed:AshLost 12
L#1 DoublesNick Genovese / Jeanne Consiglio vs John Fuller / Laurie Zrenda7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Lange / Chris Tack vs Michael MacKey / Martha Gibson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Rosenthal / Jean Bacon vs Steven Johnson / Kathleen Kenyon6-3, 6-1
2024-06-02vs OSB:55& 7.0 Mixed:Giles/KatzLost 12
L#1 DoublesBobbi Deangelis / Richard Hoin vs Paul Noniewicz / Eileen Duggan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Dest / Andrew Taylor vs George Brooks / Cathleen Carroll4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Consiglio / Michael Rosenthal vs Rocco Tricarico / MaryBeth Giles6-2, 6-3
2024-05-18vs OSB:55& 7.0 Mixed:Giles/KatzLost 12
W#1 DoublesNick Genovese / Stefanie Kreiger vs Thomas Noniewicz / MaryBeth Giles6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaggie Nava / Chris Tack vs George Brooks / Carolyn Katz4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Dest / Andrew Taylor vs Eileen Duggan / Eric Masson0-6, 2-6
2024-04-12vs OSB:55& 7.0 Mixed:Giles/KatzLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Lange / Steven Sax vs Cathleen Carroll / Paul Malafronte4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Bastarache / Chris Tack vs Valerie Libert / Anthony Luongo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRay Cerritelli / Susan Haven vs Nancy Schumann / George Brooks6-4, 7-5
2024-04-07vs LS:55& 7.0 Mixed:AshWon 21
W#1 DoublesStefanie Kreiger / Nick Genovese vs Roisin MacKey / Scott Soderberg4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaggie Nava / Michael Rosenthal vs Sheryl Ash / Michael MacKey6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBobbi Deangelis / Brian Parker vs Patricia Conway / James Craffey6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Susan Haven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Linda Dest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Bobbi Deangelis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Julie Bastarache
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Maggie Nava
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Steven Sax
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Taylor
published 3.5
Carol Lange
published 3.5
3.22
Stefanie Kreiger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jeanne Consiglio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jean Bacon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Tack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Michael Rosenthal
published
Nick Genovese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ray Cerritelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Hoin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Consiglio + Richard Hoin11556% games+2.7% vs expected
Nick Genovese + Jeanne Consiglio6254% games−3.8% vs expected
Ray Cerritelli + Jean Bacon6656% games−6.6% vs expected
Susan Haven + Ray Cerritelli2542% games−17.4% vs expected
Susan Haven + Richard Hoin6747% gamesnot enough data
Linda Dest + Ray Cerritelli4354% gamesnot enough data
Nick Genovese + Jean Bacon4160% gamesnot enough data
Bobbi Deangelis + Nick Genovese404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Haven
103W–105L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Linda Dest
51W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Bobbi Deangelis
50W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.46
Julie Bastarache
60W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
Maggie Nava
83W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Steven Sax
84W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Taylor
50W–47L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carol Lange
61W–63L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefanie Kreiger
112W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
Jeanne Consiglio
97W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Jean Bacon
79W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Chris Tack
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Rosenthal
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Genovese
91W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Cerritelli
55W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Hoin
51W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.