Teams

Chestnut Ridge - 18+ 5.0 M

2026 18&Over Men · 5.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-27vs NRRC3 TIA - 18+ 5.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRodrigo Latorraca / Ted Berkowitz vs Luigi Moretti / Lukas Michenka4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMauricio Miranda vs Luke Nickerson7-5, 6-1
2026-07-21vs NRRC - 18+ 5.0 M - Papi ProsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Wallace / Brad Maisey vs Lukas Dow / Jean-Benoit Belin6-2, 6-2
2026-06-30vs Southern: CTC Elite TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesTed Berkowitz / Brian Power vs Harry Simaioforidis / Alexandros Roumpis2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJohn James / Fabrizio Rotati vs Juan Cruz Scoppetta / Pablo Numbela2-6, 3-6
2026-06-21vs Long Beach, AzagarWon 10
W#1 DoublesDillon McKenzie / Andreas Landgrebe vs Adam Borak / Nasser Ghaffar7-6, 7-6
2026-06-18vs NRRC - 18+ 5.0 M - Papi ProsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBen Shapiro / Brian Power vs Jean-Benoit Belin / Alexandre Gagnon6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHarry Seaborn vs Paulo Chiapponi1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Latorraca / Marko Arboleda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-09vs Sportime LI 18+ 5.0 MLost 12
L#1 DoublesTed Berkowitz / Mauricio Miranda vs Alberto Romea / Eduardo Morais1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarko Arboleda vs Samrakshyak Bajracharya7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrad Breakstone / Brad Maisey vs Carlos Campo / Nathan Anderson7-5, 6-4
2026-05-28vs Southern: CTC Elite TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesFabrizio Rotati / Andreas Landgrebe vs Jose Olivares / Johandri Perez2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarko Arboleda vs Juan Cruz Scoppetta5-7, 3-6
2026-05-20vs NRRC3 TIA - 18+ 5.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Maisey / Michael Wallace vs Adam Marianacci / Lukas Michenka4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFabrizio Rotati vs Juan Pablo Herrera2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEnrique Catter / Luis Arguello vs Chauncey Allers / Christopher Lin6-1, 6-3
2026-05-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesDillon McKenzie / Andreas Landgrebe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Brad Maisey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.79
Harry Seaborn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.76
Rodrigo Latorraca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ben Shapiro
published 5
4.75
Brian Power
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.74
Marko Arboleda
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.64
Ted Berkowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.56
Neeladitya Roy
published
4.52
Enrique Catter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.49
Andreas Landgrebe
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4.5
4.47
Adam Hornby
published 4.5
4.43
Seth Roberts
published
4.43
Brad Breakstone
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.42
Mauricio Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.36
John James
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.36
Fabrizio Rotati
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Luis Arguello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John James + Brad Breakstone8075% games+19.7% vs expected
John James + Rodrigo Latorraca4651% games+2.0% vs expected
Brian Power + Ben Shapiro1449% gamesnot enough data
Luis Arguello + Enrique Catter314 matchesnot enough data
Seth Roberts + Brad Breakstone033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brad Maisey
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.83
Harry Seaborn
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
Rodrigo Latorraca
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Ben Shapiro
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Brian Power
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.75
Marko Arboleda
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.74
Ted Berkowitz
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Neeladitya Roy
45W–24L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
Enrique Catter
30W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Andreas Landgrebe
91W–38L career · 23 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
4.49
4.5
Adam Hornby
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
Seth Roberts
14W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Brad Breakstone
42W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
Mauricio Miranda
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
John James
54W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
4.36
Fabrizio Rotati
40W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
Luis Arguello
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michael Wallace
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.