Teams

Manhattan McHugh

2023 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 6.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-01-04vs Rabinovich/RappaccioliWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Sharp / Chris Flood vs Bari Rabinovich / Charlie Dreyfus6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Sasaki / Ernie Tai vs Shannon Mahovlic / Edward Hong6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Spilko / Yuanbin Wang vs Nahndi Bush / John Tam6-1, 7-5
2022-12-14vs Haselschwerdt/KorngutWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Sharp / David Seah vs Erica Korngut / Maximilian Paulus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelody Peng / Chris Flood vs Morgan Turkewitz / Bryan Settles7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Sasaki / Ernie Tai vs Dhruv Kanwal / Laura Kline7-6, 6-0
2022-12-04vs FunfgeldSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Ng / Elizabeth Sharp vs Andrew Taclan / Ailsa Trinidad2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelody Peng / Ernie Tai vs Joseph Tloczkowski / Elizabeth Guidi6-0, 6-0
2022-11-16vs Rabinovich/RappaccioliWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Sasaki / Ernie Tai vs Ryan Ray / Lucy Ray6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYuanbin Wang / Emily Spilko vs Edward Hong / MacKenzie Burkemper6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott McHugh / Melody Peng vs Erica Halpern / John Tam6-4, 6-1
2022-11-08vs Haselschwerdt/KorngutLost 12
L#1 DoublesErnie Tai / Jessica Sasaki vs Erica Korngut / Maximilian Paulus3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYuanbin Wang / Elizabeth Sharp vs Lucia Carey / Bryan Settles4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott McHugh / Melody Peng vs Katherine Martin / Steven Kline6-3, 6-1
2022-11-03vs FunfgeldWon 30
W#1 DoublesErnie Tai / Jessica Sasaki vs Choi Fei Ko / Charles Bernard6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelody Peng / Andrew Ng vs Matt Blakeman / Lysa Scarselli6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChris Flood / CARLA GALLARDO vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-28vs Rabinovich/RappaccioliWon 20
W#1 DoublesErnie Tai / Jessica Sasaki vs Matthew Marsella / Jeannette Koster6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Hohl / Jacqueline Tran vs Andre Rappaccioli / Shannon Mahovlic6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-23vs Haselschwerdt/KorngutWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Seah / Melody Peng vs Erica Korngut / Bryan Settles4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChris Flood / CARLA GALLARDO vs Karan Bhugra / Kriti Kanwal6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYuanbin Wang / Elizabeth Sharp vs Bret Deasy / Katherine Martin6-3, 7-5
2022-10-16vs FunfgeldWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Seah / Melody Peng vs Kosta Halkias / Rachel Ferman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Flood / Abigail Rossman vs Gustavo Coria / Connie Yilmaz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott McHugh / Honey Debelle vs Charles Bernard / Diana Lee4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Manhattan McHugh0920718176
2Haselschwerdt/Korngut0918824210
3Rabinovich/Rappaccioli0932449306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Melody Peng
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
David Seah
published 4
3.38
Chris Flood
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Daniel F Noriega
published 3.5
3.14
Jessica Sasaki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Emily Spilko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Ernie Tai
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Scott McHugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Honey Debelle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Andrew Ng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
CARLA GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Letian Wang
published
Steve Hohl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Sasaki + Ernie Tai5170% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melody Peng
117W–81L career · 10 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
4
David Seah
64W–40L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Flood
139W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Daniel F Noriega
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jessica Sasaki
81W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Emily Spilko
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Ernie Tai
19W–9L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
Scott McHugh
100W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Honey Debelle
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Andrew Ng
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
CARLA GALLARDO
15W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Elizabeth Sharp
28W–18L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
Letian Wang
0W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Hohl
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.