Teams

CVTA RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs BRMST REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Heiden / Kathy Philipp vs Erin Kintzle / Denise Belton2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Sue Vanderberg3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesUrsula Scarano / Michelle Wieber vs Morgan Arvisais / Noelle Anthony1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Spangler / Natalya Walsworth vs Claudia Booton / Jeanne Peoples5-7, 1-6
2022-07-13vs MEA NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathy Philipp / Pamela Heiden vs Christie Deluca / Jenny Knight3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNatalya Walsworth vs Anne Beblavi4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTrish Jimenez / Dionne Jimenez vs Jahnavi Brenner / Chris Zwolfer3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Wieber / Beth Spangler vs Mary Kaiser / Tanya Goble1-6, 4-6
2022-07-11vs RCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Heiden / Kathy Philipp vs Meghan Vogel / Michele Gosselin1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Windy Cook6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Spangler / Michelle Wieber vs Leslie Lewis / Heather Wilson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNatalya Walsworth / Joyce Kelly vs Elisabeth Rosen / Jill Keogh4-6, 4-4
2022-06-27vs LTA GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTrish Jimenez / Dionne Jimenez vs Catherine Romero / Hilary Hartwig6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNatalya Walsworth vs Lynn Schulte4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesUrsula Scarano / Michelle Wieber vs Sonja Gifford / Logan Newens7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Spangler / Joyce Kelly vs Kim Britt / Janine Clark0-6, 1-6
2022-06-20vs NJ BLACKLost 04
L#1 DoublesPamela Heiden / Kathy Philipp vs Emese Nagy / Emily Markwell6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Anne Perry2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesUrsula Scarano / Natalya Walsworth vs Verhonica Hirst / Laura Pivovar6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Wieber / Joyce Kelly vs Suzanne Watkins / Natasha Uecker6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs NJ REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPamela Heiden / Kathy Philipp vs Dayna Ashley-Oehm / Jennifer Ashley3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Taryn Young6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSue Mills / Ursula Scarano vs Diana Guettlein / Bettina Wolpow7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJoyce Kelly / Natalya Walsworth vs Kim Melvin / Caryn Moller6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-04vs MEA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPamela Heiden / Sue Mills vs Desiree Slavick / Aileen Bryan6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJill Mendoza vs Shannon Hassan7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNatalya Walsworth / Ursula Scarano vs Jennifer Mitchell / Nicole McGann6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoyce Kelly / Beth Spangler vs Kate Worth / Julie Smith1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Joyce Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Dionne Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Jill Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Becky Fase
published 4
3.68
Trish Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Pamela Heiden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ursula Scarano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Kathy Philipp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Beth Spangler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Michelle Wieber
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Natalya Walsworth
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sue Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dionne Jimenez + Trish Jimenez231355% games+2.6% vs expected
Pamela Heiden + Becky Fase181653% games+2.3% vs expected
Pamela Heiden + Ursula Scarano3446% games−5.1% vs expected
Kathy Philipp + Michelle Wieber3344% games−5.5% vs expected
Natalya Walsworth + Ursula Scarano1640% games−6.5% vs expected
Kathy Philipp + Pamela Heiden7845% games−8.2% vs expected
Kathy Philipp + Ursula Scarano134 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Heiden + Sue Mills134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Kelly
70W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Dionne Jimenez
117W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Jill Mendoza
105W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Becky Fase
83W–64L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Trish Jimenez
29W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Pamela Heiden
35W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ursula Scarano
19W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
Kathy Philipp
35W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Beth Spangler
2W–38L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
Michelle Wieber
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalya Walsworth
6W–27L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Mills
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.