Teams

Montana/Desin/18&Over7.0MX

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-02vs AcersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Shaffer / Laura Rembe vs Joe Salyer / Jimena Diaz6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCollin Dunn / Cheryl Scott vs Dana Miller / DIANA RAIMONDO6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCyndy Desin / Darin Newton vs Jill Mattie / Dennis Vap6-2, 6-1
2025-03-01vs AcersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCollin Dunn / Cheryl Scott vs Jill Mattie / Dennis Vap7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beck / Brian Scott vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Joe Salyer6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCyndy Desin / Darin Newton vs Jimena Diaz / Dana Miller2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-28vs AcersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Shaffer / Laura Rembe vs Dana Miller / Jimena Diaz6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Scott / Barbara Beck vs Jill Mattie / Dennis Vap3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCollin Dunn / Cheryl Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Desin/18&Over7.0MX3063765

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Cheryl Scott
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Barbara Beck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Collin Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Darin Newton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
James Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Brian Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Cyndy Desin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Laura Rembe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndy Desin + Darin Newton5160% gamesnot enough data
Brian Scott + Cheryl Scott0623% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Scott
16W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Barbara Beck
9W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Collin Dunn
2W–0L career · type T · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darin Newton
7W–15L career · type T · 6 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
James Shaffer
47W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Brian Scott
0W–18L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cyndy Desin
59W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
Laura Rembe
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.