Teams

S OR-ACB-Moore

2025 MIXED 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-08vs TTC-HamiltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesIrene Moore / Travis Anderson vs Mark Szabo / Ranee McDougal7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTonya Dirk / Dennis Moore vs Miguel Angel Trejo Romo / Jane Brass Barth3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Godat / Kitt Hawkins vs Craig Massie / Claudia Hamilton3-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs ESTC-Racket RockersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Vana / Kitt Hawkins vs Christopher Casey / Paula Thompson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTonya Dirk / Dennis Moore vs Jody Rolnick / Bryon Quick6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChristina Godat / Travis Anderson vs Tori Waples / Michael Waples4-6, 5-7
2025-06-07vs S OR-STSC-SchmellingLost 03
L#1 DoublesIrene Moore / Travis Anderson vs Denise Wolfe / David Lapray6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDennis Moore / Tonya Dirk vs Sandy Garry / Paul Garry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKitt Hawkins / Jennifer Vana vs Jennifer Schmelling / Van Khieu5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-STSC-Schmelling3072461
2S OR-ACB-Moore214513105
3TTC-Hamilton12541084
4ESTC-Racket Rockers03271594

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Tonya Dirk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Jennifer Vana
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Irene Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kitt Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Travis Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Christina Godat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Dennis Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Anderson + Irene Moore5254% games+2.5% vs expected
Kitt Hawkins + Jennifer Vana2345% games−0.3% vs expected
Tonya Dirk + Dennis Moore4155% gamesnot enough data
Kitt Hawkins + Irene Moore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tonya Dirk
83W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4
Jennifer Vana
148W–145L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Irene Moore
58W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Kitt Hawkins
40W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Travis Anderson
61W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Christina Godat
45W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dennis Moore
9W–4L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.