Teams

Westlake Tennis 3.5

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Jessica Browne
published
3.67
Arielle Easton
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.43
Frances Kharaghani
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.42
Hannah Buehring
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.40
Lindsay Cowen
published
3.26
Susan Cass
published
3.25
Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
LAUREN WILKINS
published
3.19
Na Shen
published
3.15
Mary Scotti
published
3.10
Beth Bearer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Georgann Lott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Mika Smyth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
LaDawn Rice
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
2.84
Emmy Tseng
published
2.82
Rayya Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Melissa Warren
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LAUREN WILKINS + LaDawn Rice3646% games+1.9% vs expected
Susan Cass + Frances Kharaghani13457% games+0.9% vs expected
Mika Smyth + Na Shen1740% games−2.4% vs expected
Beth Bearer + Frances Kharaghani4156% gamesnot enough data
Beth Bearer + Mary Scotti224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Cowen + LAUREN WILKINS134 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Buehring + Frances Kharaghani224 matchesnot enough data
LAUREN WILKINS + Na Shen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Browne
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
4
Arielle Easton
56W–30L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Frances Kharaghani
93W–76L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Hannah Buehring
81W–73L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Lindsay Cowen
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Susan Cass
25W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt
58W–49L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
LAUREN WILKINS
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Na Shen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Mary Scotti
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Beth Bearer
87W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Georgann Lott
63W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Mika Smyth
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
LaDawn Rice
35W–26L career · 13 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Emmy Tseng
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Rayya Cooke
52W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Melissa Warren
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.