Teams

WH Chapman SSL A40-4.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-08vs PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Miles / Tambra Ford vs Kris Ponstine / Rosemary Fiscus6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTonia Shoup / Carol Heinicke vs Amy Grasman / Christine Hoeksema6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Buck / Ann Wright vs Christina Sanchez-Martin / Joan Hannadarrell3-6, 5-7
2022-05-25vs MVC Slater SSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Molitor / Marjori Cantwell vs Michelle Spees / Danuta Radzio6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDarla Wright / Anna Carlin vs Andrea Wolfe / Maria Kuitula6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Uryga / Jackie Buck vs Erin Fouty / Julie Walton6-2, 6-3
2022-05-11vs HC Kroeze SSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesTambra Ford / Michelle Molitor vs Tanya Gonzalez / Kristine Mestrom2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarjori Cantwell / Carol Heinicke vs Kathy Labozzetta / Joan Kroeze6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Buck / Stephanie Lowes vs Donna Jorritsma / Becky Pollack4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-20vs MVS Lee SSL A40-4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTambra Ford / Carol Heinicke vs Meera Lee / Kerry Clay4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Buck / Laura Uryga vs Jane Everhart / Michele Ferenchick0-6, 3-6
2022-04-13vs GR Stevens SSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Carlin / Tambra Ford vs Laurie Scott / Marci Tawney6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJackie Buck / Laura Uryga vs Naoko Kobrak / Cynthia Papp7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Lowes / Tonia Shoup vs Gayl Kessel / Maureen Stevens6-2, 6-4
2022-03-02vs MY Trebing SSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie Buck / Laura Uryga vs Susan Trillet / Ronda Stafford6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Carlin / Jessica Anderson vs Denise Lancaster / Glorianna Fogarty6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTonia Shoup / Carol Heinicke vs Leslie Kepplinger / Betty Trebing6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVS Lee SSL A40-4.0W60171497
2WH Chapman SSL A40-4.0W5113514143
3HC Kroeze SSL A40-4.0W339920162
4PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0W339921171
5MVC Slater SSL A40-4.0W339922172
6MY Trebing SSL A40-4.0W1521633195
7GR Stevens SSL A40-4.0W0641429196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Anna Carlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Tambra Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Darla Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jackie Buck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Marjori Cantwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Michelle Molitor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Carol Heinicke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Stephanie Lowes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Uryga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tonia Shoup
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Lowes + Jessica Anderson6165% games+12.7% vs expected
Marjori Cantwell + Tambra Ford15262% games+5.8% vs expected
Michelle Molitor + Anna Carlin28459% games+2.8% vs expected
Jackie Buck + Michelle Molitor7455% games−2.9% vs expected
Marjori Cantwell + Michelle Molitor71049% games−3.3% vs expected
Tambra Ford + Michelle Molitor5447% games−3.9% vs expected
Marjori Cantwell + Carol Heinicke5848% games−5.4% vs expected
Stephanie Lowes + Michelle Molitor2941% games−14.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Carlin
90W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Tambra Ford
177W–127L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Darla Wright
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Buck
111W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjori Cantwell
139W–100L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Michelle Molitor
86W–72L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Carol Heinicke
117W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Stephanie Lowes
47W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Jessica Anderson
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Laura Uryga
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tonia Shoup
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.