Teams

PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-08vs WH Chapman SSL A40-4.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Ponstine / Rosemary Fiscus vs Kimberly Miles / Tambra Ford4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Grasman / Christine Hoeksema vs Tonia Shoup / Carol Heinicke4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Joan Hannadarrell vs Jackie Buck / Ann Wright6-3, 7-5
2022-05-11vs GR Stevens SSL A40-4.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoan Hannadarrell / Kris Ponstine vs Naoko Kobrak / Laurie Scott4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Hoeksema / Amy Grasman vs Cynthia Papp / Maureen Stevens6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Sanchez-Martin / Andrea Skidmore vs Gayl Kessel / Kathleen Dunnick6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-27vs HC Kroeze SSL A40-4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Konwinski / Joan Hannadarrell vs Heather Davis / Carol Genzink6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Skidmore / Karen Reid vs Eileen van Doornik / Emily Van Faasen6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Christine Hoeksema vs Kathy Kroeze / Joan Kroeze1-6, 2-6
2022-04-13vs MY Trebing SSL A40-4.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Kris Ponstine vs Susan Trillet / Ronda Stafford6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Mast / Christina Sanchez-Martin vs Denise Lancaster / Leslie Kepplinger6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDianne McCormick / Amy Grasman vs Pamela Butt / Glorianna Fogarty3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-16vs MVS Lee SSL A40-4.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Diane Konwinski vs Becky Musgraves / Sarah Williams6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeredith Mast / Joan Hannadarrell vs Jane Everhart / Sharon Barnes5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDianne McCormick / Karen Reid vs Jennifer Aleccia / Debbie Buchan0-6, 3-6
2022-03-02vs MVC Slater SSL A40-4.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoan Hannadarrell / Diane Konwinski vs Amy McKenzie / Amber Slater6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Skidmore / Meredith Mast vs Ashley Diedrich / Danielle Juhle2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Fiscus / Karen Reid vs Andrea Wolfe / Maria Kuitula2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 4.0 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVS Lee SSL A40-4.0W60171497
2WH Chapman SSL A40-4.0W5113514143
3HC Kroeze SSL A40-4.0W339920162
4PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0W339921171
5MVC Slater SSL A40-4.0W339922172
6MY Trebing SSL A40-4.0W1521633195
7GR Stevens SSL A40-4.0W0641429196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joan Hannadarrell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Christine Hoeksema
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Meredith Mast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kris Ponstine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Diane Konwinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Rosemary Fiscus
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Dianne McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Andrea Skidmore
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Amy Grasman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Christina Sanchez-Martin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karen Reid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Konwinski + Joan Hannadarrell5256% games+5.6% vs expected
Joan Hannadarrell + Christina Sanchez-Martin521558% games+3.4% vs expected
Rosemary Fiscus + Kris Ponstine121151% games+2.9% vs expected
Kris Ponstine + Christine Hoeksema4156% games+2.6% vs expected
Meredith Mast + Christina Sanchez-Martin3348% games+2.0% vs expected
Christine Hoeksema + Christina Sanchez-Martin7555% games+1.1% vs expected
Rosemary Fiscus + Andrea Skidmore2540% games+0.1% vs expected
Christine Hoeksema + Joan Hannadarrell4653% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan Hannadarrell
189W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Christine Hoeksema
61W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Meredith Mast
86W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kris Ponstine
116W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Diane Konwinski
43W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Rosemary Fiscus
72W–114L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dianne McCormick
42W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Skidmore
98W–60L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Grasman
56W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christina Sanchez-Martin
148W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Karen Reid
20W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.