Teams

CX 5.5 LT Eng

2025 NEOTA Combo Mixed · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 2.71 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-12vs CX 5.5 MM BodeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Kindell / Dave Kindell vs Adnan Kazazic / Sanita Kazazic4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSean Freeman / Carrie Freeman vs Jeff Kazol / Jackie McHugh3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Yang / David Nemenz vs Kelly Haas / Matt Spronz3-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs CX 5.5 CV2 FryWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Schlayer / Elizabeth McCauley vs Zhigang Gao / Jin Shao2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDave Kindell / Taylor Kindell vs Lance Fry / Michele Fry6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAaron Herman / Jenny Yang vs Paul Fantauzzo / Debbie Fantauzzo6-1, 6-0
2025-03-29vs CX 5.5 TP ReeseLost 12
L#1 DoublesRishi Goel / Sarah Goel vs Diego Hernandez / Michelle Coenen6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDave Kindell / Taylor Kindell vs Raymond Pulido / Karen Gade-Pulido6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAbbey Eng / Alan Eng vs Allyson Stewart / John Frank3-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs CX 5.5 CV1 CarrollLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Schlayer / Elizabeth McCauley vs Orlando Dangond / Ali Payerl2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Eng / Abbey Eng vs Steve Poe / Lori Kaminski0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-08vs CX 5.5 CV2 FryWon 21
L#1 DoublesSean Freeman / Carrie Freeman vs Zhigang Gao / Jin Shao4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDave Kindell / Taylor Kindell vs Arthur Catalano / Milly Catalano7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAaron Herman / Jenny Yang vs Thomas Herbener / Suzanne Herbener6-0, 6-2
2025-03-01vs CX 5.5 MM BodeWon 30
W#1 DoublesRishi Goel / Sarah Goel vs Brian Bode / Rebecca Dworakowski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Eng / Abbey Eng vs David Bode / Debra Bode6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Schlayer / Elizabeth McCauley vs Dale Walter / Jackie McHugh6-3, 6-1
2025-02-22vs CX 5.5 TP ReeseLost 12
L#1 DoublesSean Freeman / Carrie Freeman vs Raymond Pulido / Karen Gade-Pulido3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Schlayer / Elizabeth McCauley vs Jeff Scafaro / Michelle Coenen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Herman / Jenny Yang vs Michelle Akhtar / Jorge Sanchez6-0, 6-2
2025-02-08vs CX 5.5 CV1 CarrollLost 03
L#1 DoublesDave Kindell / Taylor Kindell vs Mike Carroll / Ali Payerl2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAbbey Eng / Alan Eng vs Celeste Asmar / Chris Janson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Nemenz / Jenny Yang vs Carl Parker / Nicole Parker3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CX 5.5 CV1 Carroll6217717174
2CX 5.5 MM Bode62131126212
3CX 5.5 TP Reese44121228219
4CX 5.5 LT Eng3591533233
5CX 5.5 CV2 Fry1791532241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Alan Eng
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Aaron Herman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dave Kindell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Rishi Goel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Michael Schlayer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Taylor Kindell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.41
David Nemenz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Elizabeth McCauley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Sarah Goel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carrie Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Abbey Eng
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jenny Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Kindell + Taylor Kindell3247% gamesnot enough data
Alan Eng + Abbey Eng134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Schlayer + Elizabeth McCauley134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Goel + Rishi Goel134 matchesnot enough data
Aaron Herman + Jenny Yang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alan Eng
72W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Aaron Herman
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Dave Kindell
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rishi Goel
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Michael Schlayer
19W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Taylor Kindell
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
2.5
David Nemenz
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Elizabeth McCauley
22W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
Sarah Goel
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Carrie Freeman
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Abbey Eng
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jenny Yang
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.