Teams

CX 5.5 CV1 Carroll

2025 NEOTA Combo Mixed · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-26vs CX 5.5 CV2 FryWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Kaminski / Steve Poe vs Loretta Snider / Lance Fry6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIvana Urbanowski / Mike Carroll vs Milly Catalano / Arthur Catalano6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Halper / Bob Halper vs Denise Derbyshire / Joseph Circelli3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-12vs CX 5.5 TP ReeseLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Parker / Carl Parker vs Diego Hernandez / Madison Cox6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCeleste Asmar / Orlando Dangond vs Amit Dhavale / Casey Houdek6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBob Halper / Anne Halper vs Amy Rauh / Jeff Stoerkel5-7, 5-7
2025-04-05vs CX 5.5 MM BodeLost 12
L#1 DoublesOrlando Dangond / Krista Ensign vs Lincoln Osborn / Sanita Kazazic4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Parker / Carl Parker vs Brian Bode / Rebecca Dworakowski6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBob Halper / Anne Halper vs Debra Bode / David Bode6-2, 6-1
2025-03-22vs CX 5.5 LT EngWon 20
W#1 DoublesOrlando Dangond / Ali Payerl vs Michael Schlayer / Elizabeth McCauley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteve Poe / Lori Kaminski vs Alan Eng / Abbey Eng6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs CX 5.5 CV2 FryWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Halper / Anne Halper vs Zhigang Gao / Jin Shao5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChris Janson / Betsey Poe vs Denise Derbyshire / Joseph Circelli6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarl Parker / Nicole Parker vs Paul Fantauzzo / Debbie Fantauzzo6-1, 6-1
2025-03-08vs CX 5.5 MM BodeWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteve Poe / Krista Ensign vs Brian Bode / Sanita Kazazic7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIvana Urbanowski / Chris Janson vs David Bode / Natalie Winer6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMike Carroll / Betsey Poe vs Paul Boduch / Jackie McHugh6-2, 6-3
2025-03-01vs CX 5.5 TP ReeseWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Janson / Celeste Asmar vs Jeff Scafaro / Casey Houdek3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Poe / Lori Kaminski vs Jacqui Davis / Phil Navallo6-2, 6-2
2025-02-08vs CX 5.5 LT EngWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Carroll / Ali Payerl vs Dave Kindell / Taylor Kindell6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCeleste Asmar / Chris Janson vs Abbey Eng / Alan Eng6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarl Parker / Nicole Parker vs David Nemenz / Jenny Yang6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CX 5.5 CV1 Carroll6217717174
2CX 5.5 MM Bode62131126212
3CX 5.5 TP Reese44121228219
4CX 5.5 LT Eng3591533233
5CX 5.5 CV2 Fry1791532241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ali Payerl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Bob Halper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Ivana Urbanowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Carl Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Betsey Poe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Chris Janson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Celeste Asmar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Krista Ensign
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Lori Kaminski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.94
Anne Halper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Mike Carroll
published
Nicole Parker
published
Orlando Dangond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Halper + Bob Halper51244% games+3.7% vs expected
Carl Parker + Nicole Parker5842% games−2.3% vs expected
Celeste Asmar + Carl Parker224 matchesnot enough data
Orlando Dangond + Ivana Urbanowski033 matchesnot enough data
Ivana Urbanowski + Carl Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ali Payerl
47W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3
Bob Halper
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Ivana Urbanowski
73W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carl Parker
65W–96L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Betsey Poe
41W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Chris Janson
17W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Celeste Asmar
36W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Krista Ensign
39W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lori Kaminski
22W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Anne Halper
24W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Mike Carroll
16W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Parker
12W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Orlando Dangond
17W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.