Teams

CTL (A) 9.0M 55 & Over (Eaker)

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Men 9.0 Combined

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-14vs CTL55/Bidwell/WRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Bradley Watkins vs Shawn Burke / Don Jeter6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGerald Sitton / Jay Tiedeman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-03vs CTL55/Bidwell/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Bradley Watkins vs GYLES GREGORY / Shawn Burke3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Sitton / Christopher Eaker vs Eric Feuerstein / Stephen Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Stricklin / Paul Owens vs Stephen Bidwell / David Moore6-4, 6-3
2026-02-28vs CTL55/Bidwell/WRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Swanson / Jay Tiedeman vs Scott Saunders / GYLES GREGORY6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGerald Sitton / Jeffrey Hook vs Stephen Bidwell / David Moore7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Owens / Christopher Eaker vs Shawn Burke / Scott Fortson6-1, 6-2
2026-02-14vs CTL55/Bidwell/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Hinson / Christopher Eaker vs Stephen Bidwell / David Moore6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Scott Swanson vs Shawn Burke / Eric Feuerstein6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJay Tiedeman / Kevin Green vs GYLES GREGORY / Stephen Anderson6-1, 6-0
2026-02-14vs CTL55/Bidwell/WRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesGerald Sitton / Christopher Eaker vs Stephen Bidwell / David Moore6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hook / Jim Hinson vs Shawn Burke / Scott Saunders6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJoseph Stricklin / Paul Owens vs GYLES GREGORY / Stephen Anderson6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Adult Men 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL (A) 9.0M 55 & Over (Eaker)50132578
2CTL55/Bidwell/WRC0521328177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Jay Tiedeman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Jeffrey Hook
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.15
Jim Hinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.08
Bradley Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Joseph Stricklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Gerald Sitton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Christopher Eaker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Paul Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Watkins + Jeffrey Hook7253% games+14.1% vs expected
Christopher Eaker + Gerald Sitton3453% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Eaker + Jim Hinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jay Tiedeman
48W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Jeffrey Hook
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Jim Hinson
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
4.5
Bradley Watkins
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Joseph Stricklin
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
Gerald Sitton
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.89
4.5
Christopher Eaker
26W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.88
Paul Owens
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Scott Swanson
21W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.