Teams

CHCC NAVY

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Brittain / Amy Beth Schulz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-19vs WP-O BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Berglund / Casey Brittain vs Suganthi Manonmani / Julie Behrman6-0, 6-4
2023-06-28vs EM BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJen de Loizaga / Amy Beth Schulz vs Briana Rimkus / Annie Burke6-1, 6-0
2023-06-19vs VC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesCasey Brittain / Jen de Loizaga vs Molly Weaver / Joyce Aycock6-3, 6-3
2023-06-14vs PTC REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Katy Cafazza6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Margit Patterson
published
3.08
Grace Link
published
3.00
Casey Brittain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Carlee Steck
published 3
2.89
2.74
Amy Beth Schulz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Mary Wilkison
published
2.58
Paige Reberry
published
2.43
Caroline Crawford
published 2.5
2.25
Jen de Loizaga
published
Kendra Abbott
published
Stacey Moreno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Brittain + Courtney Berglund9455% games+9.7% vs expected
Casey Brittain + Amy Beth Schulz9262% games−4.3% vs expected
Courtney Berglund + Carlee Steck4448% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margit Patterson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Grace Link
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Casey Brittain
57W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Carlee Steck
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Courtney Berglund
35W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Amy Beth Schulz
41W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Mary Wilkison
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Paige Reberry
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Caroline Crawford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%68%32%
2.43
Jen de Loizaga
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.25
Kendra Abbott
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Moreno
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.