PTC RED
2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
10 players · average NTRP 2.57 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings108 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CHCC NAVY | 7 | 0 | 4 | 111 |
| 2EM NAVY | 7 | 0 | 5 | 95 |
| 3PRKR GREEN | 7 | 0 | 6 | 97 |
| 4LPTC BLUE | 7 | 0 | 8 | 112 |
| 5WP-O GREEN | 7 | 0 | 10 | 118 |
| 6BM NAVY | 7 | 0 | 10 | 124 |
| 7DTC RED | 7 | 0 | 14 | 139 |
| 8BCC GREEN | 7 | 0 | 14 | 146 |
| 9EM GREEN | 6 | 0 | 6 | 93 |
| 10KC-RH BLUE | 6 | 1 | 8 | 107 |
| 11BCC NAVY | 6 | 1 | 8 | 117 |
| 12SV ORANGE | 6 | 1 | 10 | 105 |
| 13NJ SILVER | 6 | 1 | 11 | 110 |
| 14HRCA-N GREEN | 6 | 1 | 12 | 122 |
| 15WP GREEN | 6 | 1 | 14 | 136 |
| 16KC-CC RED | 6 | 1 | 15 | 155 |
| 17WC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 15 | 148 |
| 18GCC BLUE | 6 | 1 | 15 | 145 |
| 19CCV NAVY | 5 | 1 | 11 | 115 |
| 20RHCC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 14 | 127 |
| 21BRMST GREEN | 5 | 2 | 15 | 125 |
| 22LEBTC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 16 | 128 |
| 23NJ BLACK | 5 | 2 | 16 | 159 |
| 24MEA GREEN | 5 | 2 | 17 | 147 |
| 25LEBTC RED | 5 | 2 | 18 | 150 |
| 26NJ ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 18 | 161 |
| 27LAC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 19 | 150 |
| 28BCST RED | 5 | 2 | 20 | 171 |
| 29SH RED | 5 | 2 | 20 | 162 |
| 30HRCA-N TEAL | 5 | 2 | 20 | 163 |
| 31GR RED | 5 | 2 | 21 | 163 |
| 32CCV BLUE | 5 | 2 | 22 | 183 |
| 33BRMST NAVY | 5 | 2 | 23 | 185 |
| 34PTC RED | 5 | 2 | 23 | 174 |
| 35ATC YELLOW | 4 | 2 | 17 | 144 |
| 36HV ORANGE | 4 | 2 | 22 | 172 |
| 37PH GREEN | 4 | 3 | 16 | 151 |
| 38HG RED | 4 | 3 | 17 | 132 |
| 39PCC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 17 | 134 |
| 40VC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 18 | 146 |
| 41DTP BLUE | 4 | 3 | 18 | 133 |
| 42EM SILVER | 4 | 3 | 19 | 143 |
| 43MC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 20 | 160 |
| 44WP-O BLUE | 4 | 3 | 20 | 171 |
| 45HV GREEN | 4 | 3 | 21 | 182 |
| 46HFII RED | 4 | 3 | 22 | 183 |
| 47CM BLUE | 4 | 3 | 22 | 167 |
| 48KC-RH NAVY | 4 | 3 | 24 | 199 |
| 49BP ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 25 | 187 |
| 50KNO NAVY | 3 | 3 | 16 | 149 |
| 51SS-H YELLOW | 3 | 3 | 17 | 146 |
| 52HW GREEN | 3 | 3 | 19 | 140 |
| 53HW RED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 156 |
| 54VCC RED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 172 |
| 55GAC GREEN | 3 | 3 | 21 | 164 |
| 56MC RED | 3 | 4 | 20 | 171 |
| 57BM RED | 3 | 4 | 20 | 156 |
| 58GCC RED | 3 | 4 | 21 | 173 |
| 59RHCC RED | 3 | 4 | 21 | 167 |
| 60WP NAVY | 3 | 4 | 21 | 159 |
| 61RCC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 23 | 172 |
| 62CK-M YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 23 | 198 |
| 63WC RED | 3 | 4 | 24 | 190 |
| 64RCC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 24 | 168 |
| 65SKY BLUE | 3 | 4 | 25 | 187 |
| 66CACM RED | 3 | 4 | 25 | 180 |
| 67SS-LT YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 25 | 181 |
| 68NJ YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 26 | 185 |
| 69RRTC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 26 | 198 |
| 70HV PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 28 | 199 |
| 71CPV BLUE | 3 | 4 | 29 | 216 |
| 72WC NAVY | 2 | 4 | 21 | 153 |
| 73MVCC GREEN | 2 | 5 | 24 | 185 |
| 74SS-LT NAVY | 2 | 5 | 25 | 197 |
| 75GTC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 26 | 190 |
| 76SKY RED | 2 | 5 | 26 | 183 |
| 77VCC GREEN | 2 | 5 | 27 | 191 |
| 78RMTC RED | 2 | 5 | 27 | 204 |
| 79HG GREEN | 2 | 5 | 29 | 204 |
| 80CCV RED | 2 | 5 | 30 | 198 |
| 81RHCC GREEN | 2 | 5 | 30 | 216 |
| 82WP BLUE | 2 | 5 | 30 | 213 |
| 83BCST BLUE | 2 | 5 | 30 | 219 |
| 84WP YELLOW | 2 | 5 | 30 | 207 |
| 85TTA-E RED | 2 | 5 | 32 | 219 |
| 86TTA-E BLUE | 2 | 5 | 33 | 212 |
| 87DTC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 33 | 227 |
| 88EM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 34 | 233 |
| 89WP-G RED | 1 | 5 | 23 | 155 |
| 90SS-G BLUE | 1 | 5 | 30 | 198 |
| 91HRCA ORANGE | 1 | 5 | 32 | 204 |
| 92HW BLUE | 1 | 6 | 27 | 201 |
| 93CVTA RED | 1 | 6 | 28 | 203 |
| 94NJ GREEN | 1 | 6 | 29 | 204 |
| 95EM RED | 1 | 6 | 31 | 209 |
| 96SS-H TEAL | 1 | 6 | 33 | 219 |
| 97CCV GREEN | 1 | 6 | 33 | 227 |
| 98GNO BLUE | 1 | 6 | 33 | 221 |
| 99GR GREEN | 1 | 6 | 35 | 217 |
| 100MEA WHITE | 1 | 6 | 36 | 225 |
| 101HIW RED | 1 | 6 | 37 | 236 |
| 102CR-DC YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 39 | 244 |
| 103SS-D PURPLE | 1 | 6 | 39 | 238 |
| 104NJ RED | 0 | 7 | 36 | 238 |
| 105DTP GREEN | 0 | 7 | 37 | 239 |
| 106CVTA BLUE | 0 | 7 | 39 | 237 |
| 107BM GREEN | 0 | 7 | 39 | 234 |
| 108GR BLUE | 0 | 7 | 40 | 250 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Marci Pisciotta + Katy Cafazza | 8–0 | 70% games | +13.4% vs expected |
| Rachel Lyons + Ashley Hunt | 4–2 | 58% games | +9.3% vs expected |
| Rachel Lyons + Katy Cafazza | 2–3 | 56% games | +8.5% vs expected |
| Christine Trigg + Rachel Lyons | 8–4 | 57% games | +1.1% vs expected |
| Katie Shader + Emily Ferguson | 2–3 | 43% games | +0.6% vs expected |
| Emily Ferguson + Maureen Radtke | 4–4 | 47% games | −1.5% vs expected |
| Christine Trigg + Katy Cafazza | 8–9 | 49% games | −1.7% vs expected |
| Rachel Lyons + Marci Pisciotta | 8–6 | 50% games | −1.8% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.