Teams

SS-G BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-19vs EM GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesZhanna Jackson / Carolyn Pearson vs Joy Jensen / Jill Bowman0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Chesnutt vs Sarah Odland4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTherese Saurber / Sue Johnson vs Molly McGill / Martha Scanlan0-6, 1-6
2023-07-06vs GAC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesZhanna Jackson / Therese Saurber vs Susan Kleimann / JoAnn Porter6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJade Sloane vs Allison Keefer1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Pearson / Megan Chesnutt vs Gwen Hubbard / Kris Stern6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-28vs HW GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTherese Saurber / Carolyn Pearson vs Jill Ellsworth / Blythe Leinwand3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Chesnutt vs Robin Earley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-14vs VCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMegan Chesnutt / Joanne Baginski vs Kristen Maley / Lindsey Bye2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesZhanna Jackson vs Cheryl Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJana GENDRON / Therese Saurber vs Lauren Kauffman / Aimee Madison6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-06-14vs WP-G REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanne Baginski / Zhanna Jackson vs Grace McLaughlin / Pam Silverberg6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJade Sloane vs Alexia Eslan1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Chesnutt / Therese Saurber vs Kim Gilliom / Meghan Rooney6-3, 6-3
2023-06-07vs ATC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesTherese Saurber / Joanne Baginski vs Chris Fisher / Betsy Brainerd1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJana GENDRON vs Allison Dodge2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Pearson / Megan Chesnutt vs Kathryn Springer / Lisa Swenson5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings108 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC NAVY701924111
2EM NAVY70192595
3PRKR GREEN70192697
4LPTC BLUE701838112
5WP-O GREEN7018310118
6BM NAVY7017410124
7DTC RED7016514139
8BCC GREEN7016514146
9EM GREEN60153693
10KC-RH BLUE611838107
11BCC NAVY611838117
12SV ORANGE6117410105
13NJ SILVER6116511110
14HRCA-N GREEN6116512122
15WP GREEN6115614136
16KC-CC RED6114715155
17WC GREEN6115615148
18GCC BLUE6114715145
19CCV NAVY5113511115
20RHCC BLUE5215614127
21BRMST GREEN5215615125
22LEBTC BLUE5214716128
23NJ BLACK5213816159
24MEA GREEN5214717147
25LEBTC RED5213818150
26NJ ORANGE5213818161
27LAC BLUE5212919150
28BCST RED5212920171
29SH RED5212920162
30HRCA-N TEAL5212920163
31GR RED5212921163
32CCV BLUE52111022183
33BRMST NAVY5213823185
34PTC RED52111023174
35ATC YELLOW4210817144
36HV ORANGE429922172
37PH GREEN4314716151
38HG RED4314717132
39PCC BLUE4313817134
40VC BLUE4312918146
41DTP BLUE4312918133
42EM SILVER4314719143
43MC GREEN4313820160
44WP-O BLUE4312920171
45HV GREEN4312921182
46HFII RED4312922183
47CM BLUE43101122167
48KC-RH NAVY4312924199
49BP ORANGE43101125187
50KNO NAVY3311716149
51SS-H YELLOW3311717146
52HW GREEN3310819140
53HW RED3381021156
54VCC RED339921172
55GAC GREEN3381021164
56MC RED34111020171
57BM RED34111020156
58GCC RED34111021173
59RHCC RED34111021167
60WP NAVY34111021159
61RCC GREEN3412923172
62CK-M YELLOW34111023198
63WC RED34101124190
64RCC BLUE3491224168
65SKY BLUE3491225187
66CACM RED34101125180
67SS-LT YELLOW34101125181
68NJ YELLOW3491226185
69RRTC NAVY3491226198
70HV PURPLE3471428199
71CPV BLUE3481329216
72WC NAVY2481021153
73MVCC GREEN2591224185
74SS-LT NAVY2591225197
75GTC BLUE2591226190
76SKY RED2591226183
77VCC GREEN2581327191
78RMTC RED2591227204
79HG GREEN2581329204
80CCV RED2571430198
81RHCC GREEN2561530216
82WP BLUE2571430213
83BCST BLUE2571430219
84WP YELLOW2581330207
85TTA-E RED2571432219
86TTA-E BLUE2561533212
87DTC BLUE2551633227
88EM BLUE2561534233
89WP-G RED1571123155
90SS-G BLUE1541430198
91HRCA ORANGE1531532204
92HW BLUE1681327201
93CVTA RED1671428203
94NJ GREEN1681329204
95EM RED1661531209
96SS-H TEAL1651633219
97CCV GREEN1651633227
98GNO BLUE1651633221
99GR GREEN1651635217
100MEA WHITE1631836225
101HIW RED1631837236
102CR-DC YELLOW1621939244
103SS-D PURPLE1621939238
104NJ RED0731836238
105DTP GREEN0731837239
106CVTA BLUE0721939237
107BM GREEN0721939234
108GR BLUE0721940250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Jana GENDRON
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Megan Chesnutt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.42
Zhanna Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Carolyn Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Therese Saurber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.64
Jade Sloane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Joanne Baginski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Chesnutt + Joanne Baginski151153% games+4.2% vs expected
Zhanna Jackson + Joanne Baginski3249% games+3.4% vs expected
Zhanna Jackson + Megan Chesnutt3251% games+2.9% vs expected
Zhanna Jackson + Jana GENDRON5353% games−0.7% vs expected
Therese Saurber + Jade Sloane11228% games−7.6% vs expected
Therese Saurber + Carolyn Pearson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jana GENDRON
37W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Megan Chesnutt
52W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%30%70%
2.57
Zhanna Jackson
28W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Carolyn Pearson
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Therese Saurber
18W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Jade Sloane
4W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.64
Joanne Baginski
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.