Teams

CDTA W M18&OX8.0 6.River Trails Miller Fri 7:30 $23

CDTA 2Winter Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over 8.0 Mixed Winter

22 players · average NTRP 4.04 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-05Won 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Strickler / Roxana Aleksic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hong / Shana Cal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephane Sarkiss / Cristobal GARCIA vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesTodd Dahlquist / Ana Chang vs Ken Sitar / Patricia Lozada6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJazz Burks / Roxana Aleksic vs Rafael Lozada / Emily Doyle3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Kerwin / Carlos Flores vs Marc Adams / Elizabeth Brownson5-7, 4-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTodd Dahlquist / Christine Munteanu vs Denise Lam / Peter Shields4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesZanobia Syed / Felix Borges vs Jason Hui / Stacey Cohen1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPIOTR WARDYNSKI / Christine Munteanu vs Yasukazu Nagatake / Chica Ida2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesColleen Chionis / Adrian Ciuca vs Toshio Sato / Yumi Ida6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarlos Flores / Andrea Kerwin vs Seisuke Narita / Risa Kimura6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesFelix Borges / Christine Munteanu vs Jared Burstein / Tina Werber3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Hong / Shana Cal vs Dennis Tysl / Terri Parse6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMing Yang / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Todd Wagner / Pamela Young1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-03vs CDTA W M18&OX8.0 3.Tam Wu Sun 7 $22Split 11
W#2 DoublesTodd Dahlquist / Ana Chang vs Sameer Talcherkar / Isabel Quinones6-2, 6-5
L#3 DoublesMing Yang / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Michael Nguyen / Bella Sirpilla4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAna Chang / Carlos Flores vs David Kaufman / Ashley Kaufman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephane Sarkiss / Cristobal GARCIA vs Youngbin Lim / Tracy Merrell4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAna Chang / Carlos Flores vs Michael Czarny / Chandana Namburi - *6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPIOTR WARDYNSKI / Shana Cal vs Han Han / Rachel Orlowski6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesColleen Chionis / Adrian Ciuca vs Eric Liao / Angela Tsang6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesTodd Dahlquist / Christine Munteanu vs Yoshitaka Nakahara / Eiko Tamaki6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAna Chang / Carlos Flores vs Agnieszka Filipek / Venkat Tipirneni7-6, 2-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJazz Burks / Zanobia Syed vs Masaki Nozawa / Tomoko Hayashida4-6, 5-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTodd Dahlquist / Colleen Chionis vs Dennis Tysl / Tina Werber6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesThomas Strickler / Roxana Aleksic vs Dave Green / Lori Green3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 8.0 Mixed Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W M18&OX8.0 4.Forest View Hayashida Sat 2 $238221920190
2CDTA W M18&OX8.0 1.Tam Wright Sat 7 $2273201025245
3CDTA W M18&OX8.0 6.River Trails Miller Fri 7:30 $2373191128231
4CDTA W M18&OX8.0 2.Glenbrook Li Sat 4 $2555161430243
5CDTA W M18&OX8.0 3.Tam Wu Sun 7 $2228102041281
6CDTA W M18&OX8.0 5.Glenbrook Tysl Sun 9 $251942654342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Stephane Sarkiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Todd Dahlquist
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
4.07
Shana Cal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Adrian Ciuca
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.04
Ana Chang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.97
Keara Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Christine Munteanu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jazz Burks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Alison Miller
published 4
3.74
Colleen Chionis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Cristobal GARCIA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Roxana Aleksic
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Andrea Kerwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Michael Hong
published
3.38
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Rahul Patet
published 3.5
Felix Borges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ming Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
PIOTR WARDYNSKI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Strickler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Crain
published
Zanobia Syed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Dahlquist + Ana Chang6261% games+4.0% vs expected
Colleen Chionis + Jazz Burks6452% games+3.3% vs expected
Todd Dahlquist + Christine Munteanu2346% games+2.7% vs expected
Colleen Chionis + Thomas Strickler5948% gamesnot enough data
Dimitrina Schoyer + Jazz Burks10461% gamesnot enough data
Alison Miller + Thomas Strickler4647% gamesnot enough data
Cristobal GARCIA + Stephane Sarkiss6457% gamesnot enough data
Todd Dahlquist + Colleen Chionis5161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephane Sarkiss
18W–11L career · type M · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Todd Dahlquist
150W–79L career · 13 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Shana Cal
140W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Adrian Ciuca
246W–154L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.04
Keara Miller
134W–114L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
4
Christine Munteanu
89W–95L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Jazz Burks
229W–226L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Alison Miller
52W–101L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Colleen Chionis
180W–187L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Cristobal GARCIA
99W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Roxana Aleksic
41W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Andrea Kerwin
24W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Michael Hong
124W–70L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Rahul Patet
112W–111L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Felix Borges
31W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ming Yang
15W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
PIOTR WARDYNSKI
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Strickler
138W–200L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
William Crain
7W–27L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zanobia Syed
27W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.