Teams

LKNA-Nardone/CSD Spartan Park

2024 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-09vs LCRE-Regan/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Merklein / Victoria Ciucci vs Coleen Foye / Leila Riccardelli1-6, 1-6
2024-05-02vs LLEM-Emlong/Andiloro NMPSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSerena Igharas / Terri Merklein vs Shana Erber / Jan Wildman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Nardone / Victoria Ciucci vs Martha Venter / Robbin Turner2-6, 1-6
2024-04-25vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 3.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Modlin / Nancy Dobratz vs Shelly Steffey / Karla Williams3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLia Smith vs Sylvia Sullivan7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-18vs LKGA-Galloway/JettonWon 20
W#2 DoublesMegan Hartley / Ann Modlin vs Lisa Mele / Hooper Sigler6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLia Smith vs Wendy Mizicko6-2, 6-3
2024-04-14vs LMCO-Collins/WestportWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Levy / Heather MacFadyen vs Melissa Collins / Heather Bain6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Nardone / Ann Modlin vs Mali Robinson / Sherilyn Dlugolenski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-28vs LCRE-Regan/WestportLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Katelyn Goodnough1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKristen Nardone vs Katherine Trask1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Cline / Victoria Ciucci vs Kathy Buaron / Christina Mullen1-6, 1-6
2024-03-21vs LLEM-Emlong/Andiloro NMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Terri Merklein vs Lori Anne Emlong / Beth Packard7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLia Smith vs PALOMA LOPEZ0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Terry / Victoria Ciucci vs Dawn Andiloro / Jan Wildman3-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 3.5 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Modlin / Jaime Cooper vs Shelly Steffey / Samantha Humphreys3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLia Smith / Lisa Levy vs Joan Stolberg / Monica Galloway6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTammy Cline / Kristen Nardone vs Cortney Griffin / Cindy Japec0-6, 0-6
2024-03-07vs LKGA-Galloway/JettonWon 21
W#1 SinglesLia Smith vs Kimberly Daise6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Modlin / Victoria Ciucci vs Wendy Mizicko / Jamie Chapman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Dobratz / Kristen Nardone vs Kathleen Galloway / Laura Gottlieb5-7, 5-7
2024-02-29vs LMCO-Collins/WestportSplit 22
L#1 SinglesAnn Modlin vs Emily Heinemann Hamilton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Merklein / Serena Igharas vs Bridgett Dedmond / Tanner Jordan7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLia Smith vs Melissa Collins6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Victoria Ciucci vs Heather Bain / Marilou Martin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Allison Terry
published 4
3.48
Megan Hartley
published
3.35
Ann Modlin
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Mandy Tirabassi
published
3.26
Lisa Levy
published
3.16
Lia Smith
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Michelle Rothenberg
published
2.88
Victoria Ciucci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.82
Terri Merklein
published
2.75
Kristen Nardone
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Levy + Serena Igharas2449% games−1.7% vs expected
Serena Igharas + Heather MacFadyen4455% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Ciucci + Ann Modlin134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Levy + Heather MacFadyen123 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Nardone + Victoria Ciucci213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Nardone + Ann Modlin123 matchesnot enough data
Heather MacFadyen + Ann Modlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Terry
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.94
Megan Hartley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Ann Modlin
82W–135L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Mandy Tirabassi
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lisa Levy
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lia Smith
67W–88L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–129L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Michelle Rothenberg
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Victoria Ciucci
58W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
Terri Merklein
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Kristen Nardone
46W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.