Teams

LLEM-Emlong/Andiloro NMP

2024 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-09vs LKGA-Galloway/JettonWon 40
W#1 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Dawn Andiloro vs Alex Jackson / Maile Kim7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMartha Venter / Leah Rand vs Kathleen Galloway / Jamie Chapman6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJana Ritter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJan Wildman / Beth Packard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-02vs LKNA-Nardone/CSD Spartan ParkLost 02
L#1 SinglesBeth Packard vs Nancy Dobratz5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShana Erber / Jan Wildman vs Serena Igharas / Terri Merklein6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-25vs LMCO-Collins/WestportSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShana Erber / Janice Starr vs Brenda Clay / Marilou Martin1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs Tanner Jordan6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Venter / Leah Rand vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Danielle Curwood6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDawn Andiloro / Lori Anne Emlong vs Astrid Peterson / Nicole Cochran3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-04-22vs LCRE-Regan/WestportLost 03
L#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs Katelyn Goodnough6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShana Erber / Jane Rodewald vs Kathy Buaron / Melinda Urban6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanice Starr / Leah Rand vs Diane Davis / Crystal Regan4-6, 0-6
2024-04-18vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 3.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Jane Rodewald vs Monica Galloway / Karla Williams0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs Kaylin Scher1-6, 3-6
2024-03-28vs LKGA-Galloway/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Packard / Shana Erber vs Maile Kim / Kimberly Daise7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJana Ritter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Venter / Leah Rand vs Kathleen Galloway / Wendy Mizicko6-2, 6-1
2024-03-21vs LKNA-Nardone/CSD Spartan ParkWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Beth Packard vs Serena Igharas / Terri Merklein5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-14vs LMCO-Collins/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Rodewald / Jana Ritter vs Melissa Collins / Astrid Peterson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Dawn Andiloro vs Sherilyn Dlugolenski / Danielle Curwood6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSara Baxter / Shana Erber vs Kathleen Stiffler / Bridgett Dedmond6-4, 6-1
2024-03-07vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 3.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLeah Rand / Amee Rush vs Shelly Steffey / Samantha Humphreys4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShana Erber / Janice Starr vs Cortney Griffin / Monica Galloway3-6, 4-6
2024-02-29vs LCRE-Regan/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Packard / Jane Rodewald vs Coleen Foye / Leila Riccardelli5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Dawn Andiloro vs Kathy Buaron / Diane Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Sara Baxter
published
3.58
Jana Ritter
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.47
PALOMA LOPEZ
published
3.45
Lori Anne Emlong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Jennifer Svienty
published
3.39
Jane Rodewald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Robbin Turner
published
3.35
Dawn Andiloro
published 3.5
3.34
Leah Rand
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Jan Wildman
published
3.21
Martha Venter
published
3.10
Shana Erber
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.08
Amee Rush
published 3.5
3.04
Beth Packard
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Ritter + Beth Packard3839% games−1.3% vs expected
Lori Anne Emlong + Beth Packard314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Baxter
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jana Ritter
109W–70L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
PALOMA LOPEZ
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Lori Anne Emlong
132W–83L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer Svienty
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Jane Rodewald
111W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Robbin Turner
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Dawn Andiloro
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Leah Rand
84W–96L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
Jan Wildman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Martha Venter
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Shana Erber
32W–52L career · 13 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amee Rush
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Beth Packard
77W–149L career · 11 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.