Teams

CACM GOLD

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs SS-H GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Stavros / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Lisa Cabot / Soyon Bueno2-6, 2-6
2023-05-15vs HW BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Stavros / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Kelly Kane / Krissie Marotto0-6, 1-6
2023-05-01vs PTC PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesCamille Ford / Sarah Stavros vs Caren Swan / Myrna Sobernheim6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-24vs HFII ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Stavros / Maya Pingle Trinen vs Su Zemla / Maren Plisko2-6, 0-6
2023-04-17vs GAC PURPLELost 01
L#1 SinglesSarah Stavros vs Alison Wheeler3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Amy Mcilwain
published 3
2.89
Ginger Merry
published
2.88
Camille Ford
published 3
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
published
2.66
2.65
Sarah Stavros
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.40
Susan Sundeen
published
Jimmie Whorton
published
Lavada Harmon
published
Leigh Stafford
published
Stephanie Bolsei
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Ford + Leigh Stafford3355% games+7.9% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Leigh Stafford3451% games+7.2% vs expected
Sarah Stavros + Camille Ford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Mcilwain
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Ginger Merry
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Camille Ford
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Tae Rice-Schlesinger
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Sarah Stavros
25W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
Susan Sundeen
6W–24L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.40
Jimmie Whorton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lavada Harmon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Stafford
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Bolsei
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.