HFII ORANGE
2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
14 players · average NTRP 3.05 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings56 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BCC GOLD | 7 | 0 | 25 | 248 |
| 2SS-LT MAROON | 6 | 1 | 22 | 249 |
| 3LEBTC PINK | 6 | 1 | 26 | 251 |
| 4ATC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 32 | 298 |
| 5GTC YELLOW | 6 | 1 | 34 | 296 |
| 6KNO GOLD | 5 | 1 | 22 | 244 |
| 7MEA GOLD | 5 | 2 | 24 | 264 |
| 8CVTA BLACK | 5 | 2 | 29 | 271 |
| 9LTFC ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 32 | 307 |
| 10WP PINK | 5 | 2 | 32 | 264 |
| 11EM YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 32 | 295 |
| 12CVTA NAVY | 5 | 2 | 34 | 323 |
| 13BRMST YELLOW | 5 | 2 | 35 | 294 |
| 14KC-RH PINK | 5 | 2 | 37 | 301 |
| 15SS-LT TEAL | 5 | 2 | 38 | 297 |
| 16PRKR RED | 5 | 2 | 39 | 324 |
| 17HV SILVER | 5 | 2 | 39 | 323 |
| 18KC-CC ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 31 | 245 |
| 19PCC SILVER | 4 | 3 | 31 | 253 |
| 20BTA-C ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 32 | 285 |
| 21KC-CC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 35 | 303 |
| 22CVTA GOLD | 4 | 3 | 36 | 305 |
| 23SKY GREY | 4 | 3 | 36 | 295 |
| 24APR-U BLUE | 4 | 3 | 39 | 312 |
| 25TTA-E PINK | 4 | 3 | 40 | 314 |
| 26CHCC RED | 4 | 3 | 43 | 345 |
| 27KC-RH GOLD | 3 | 4 | 36 | 294 |
| 28GAC PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 37 | 297 |
| 29BRMST SILVER | 3 | 4 | 38 | 306 |
| 30HFII ORANGE | 3 | 4 | 38 | 305 |
| 31CR-DC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 40 | 311 |
| 32RCC RED | 3 | 4 | 41 | 311 |
| 33MC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 41 | 302 |
| 34VC TEAL | 3 | 4 | 41 | 310 |
| 35PCC GOLD | 3 | 4 | 42 | 313 |
| 36HIW GREEN | 3 | 4 | 45 | 353 |
| 37CCC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 45 | 328 |
| 38PTC PINK | 3 | 4 | 45 | 331 |
| 39RMTC BLACK | 3 | 4 | 46 | 341 |
| 40WP BLACK | 3 | 4 | 47 | 335 |
| 41SS-LT GOLD | 2 | 4 | 40 | 304 |
| 42GR SILVER | 2 | 4 | 40 | 301 |
| 43CM ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 39 | 315 |
| 44BM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 40 | 308 |
| 45GTC MAROON | 2 | 5 | 48 | 341 |
| 46CACM BLUE | 2 | 5 | 52 | 357 |
| 47LEBTC YELLOW | 1 | 5 | 47 | 326 |
| 48HW YELLOW | 1 | 6 | 52 | 376 |
| 49GPTC RED | 1 | 6 | 55 | 367 |
| 50CVTA GREEN | 1 | 6 | 56 | 363 |
| 51GR NAVY | 1 | 6 | 60 | 390 |
| 52TTA-E GOLD | 0 | 7 | 52 | 350 |
| 53WP-G GREEN | 0 | 7 | 56 | 374 |
| 54CACM GOLD | 0 | 7 | 59 | 384 |
| 55SS-D GREEN | 0 | 7 | 59 | 384 |
| 56RMTC GREEN | 0 | 7 | 59 | 376 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Danielle Drohan + Erika Troyer | 4–1 | 62% games | +20.1% vs expected |
| Erika Troyer + Katie Ross | 7–0 | 68% games | +15.3% vs expected |
| Erika Troyer + Sarah Hunter | 10–2 | 60% games | +8.1% vs expected |
| Erika Troyer + Su Zemla | 9–1 | 59% games | +7.8% vs expected |
| Tricia Tichota + Su Zemla | 3–2 | 62% games | +6.6% vs expected |
| Danielle Drohan + Amanda Nelson | 4–3 | 55% games | +6.4% vs expected |
| Maren Plisko + Su Zemla | 8–0 | 64% games | +4.7% vs expected |
| Danielle Drohan + Stephanie Tomeo | 4–2 | 57% games | +3.7% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.