Teams

LCTA40/Cooke/MPR

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Men - 6.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.23 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Men - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Carter Rowson
published 3.5
3.30
Benjy Cooke
published 3.5
3.27
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Bryan Gawrych
published 3.5
3.24
Steven Howle
published
3.17
Kevin Shuler
published
3.06
Brian Sakre
published 3.5
2.98
Ken Ruggiero
published
2.80
David Rembert
published 3
2.79
Kyle Murrell
published
2.76
Freddy Fiorillo
published 3
2.76
Michael Vecchiolla
published
Bruce Miller
published 3
Chris Ravenel
published 3
2.73
Edward Oswald
published 3
2.73
Joe Wray
published
2.70
Brian Kornahrens
published 3
2.46
Rence Jones
published
Jason O'Leary
published
Mike Clawson
published
Sean Houseal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kornahrens + Kevin Shuler1449% games+6.4% vs expected
Brian Kornahrens + Benjy Cooke2454% games+4.7% vs expected
Carter Rowson + Kevin Shuler4352% games+2.7% vs expected
Freddy Fiorillo + Rence Jones3346% games+1.4% vs expected
Bruce Miller + Ken Ruggiero3947% games−1.9% vs expected
Brian Kornahrens + Freddy Fiorillo3549% games−2.9% vs expected
Brian Kornahrens + Brian Sakre3343% gamesnot enough data
Carter Rowson + Brian Sakre3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carter Rowson
51W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Benjy Cooke
26W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Johnson
128W–179L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bryan Gawrych
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Howle
34W–44L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Kevin Shuler
44W–69L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Brian Sakre
21W–41L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Ken Ruggiero
43W–53L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
David Rembert
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kyle Murrell
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Freddy Fiorillo
28W–35L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Michael Vecchiolla
18W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Bruce Miller
21W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Chris Ravenel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Edward Oswald
19W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Joe Wray
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brian Kornahrens
66W–76L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Rence Jones
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
Jason O'Leary
29W–35L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Clawson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Houseal
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.