Teams

DAVIE STADIUM CW5.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-20vs CASTLEWOOD CC CW5.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesNaghmeh Nouri / Lana Rak vs Anna Barletta / Nalini Williams6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-13vs CHABOT CANYON CW5.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLana Rak / Angela Heath vs Rebecca Gambatese / Grace Kim6-3, 6-1
2024-10-12vs Bay Club Fremont CW5.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLana Rak / Caroline Ehrlich vs Lexi He / Shiru CAO2-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs CLAREMONT R and S CW5.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesKali Williams / Lana Rak vs Alicia Alban / Laura Guevara3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-28vs CLAREMONT R and S CW5.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesKali Williams / Lana Rak vs Rohini Haar / Cynthia Reiss6-0, 6-3
2024-09-15vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS CW5.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLana Rak / Angela Heath vs JoAnn Mar / Ginny Mayer6-2, 7-5
2024-08-28vs DIABLO CC CW5.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Mendoza / Lana Rak vs Lindsay Walker / Carla Forgham1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Lily Gilels
published
2.80
Lana Rak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Molly Stern
published
2.71
Kali Williams
published
2.69
Tirzah Williams
published
2.69
Angela Heath
published 3
2.61
Charlotte Niel
published 3
2.53
Eve Stewart
published
2.46
Siddhi Bahadkar
published
2.43
Soroya Wood
published
2.22
May Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Heath + Charlotte Niel134 matchesnot enough data
Eve Stewart + Molly Stern213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lily Gilels
18W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3
Lana Rak
57W–46L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Molly Stern
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Kali Williams
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Tirzah Williams
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Angela Heath
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Charlotte Niel
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Eve Stewart
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Siddhi Bahadkar
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%62%38%
2.46
Soroya Wood
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
May Lee
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.