Teams

Betty's

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.42 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Roark / Carrie Woody vs Catherine Mower / Karen Orgill7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesShelby Plotkin vs Kylie Clark6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Digney / Dayton Schaefer vs Melissa Clark / De'Aun Sandvig4-6, 2-3
2026-06-18vs FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAMEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBailey Benham / Nicole Fitzpatrick vs Sarah Rahim / Kimberly Buzbee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKacie Price / Allison Currie vs Stevie Josey / Natica Smith6-0, 6-2
2026-06-11vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 12
L#2 DoublesErika Braver / Bailey Benham vs Melissa Clark / Rose Cabato4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesShelby Plotkin vs Angie Koumaris6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Woody / Allison Currie vs Emmy Hufnagel / Katie Turner6-0, 6-1
2026-05-28vs FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAMEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Bloomquist / Bailey Benham vs Emily Pomeroy / Caitlyn Sagraves7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKacie Price / Kelly Roark vs Adisha Tamrakar / Natica Smith6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesShelby Plotkin vs Ashley Seay6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDayton Schaefer / Mary Palmer vs Sarah Rahim / Kimberly Buzbee4-6, 4-6
2026-04-23vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Bloomquist / Bailey Benham vs Catherine Mower / Karen Orgill6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErika Braver / Kacie Price vs De'Aun Sandvig / Melissa Clark6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKelly Roark / Katie Nasr vs Carissa Villaflor / Melanie Cox0-6, 5-7
2026-04-16vs FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAMEWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Braver / Bailey Benham vs Ellabeth Strack / Stevie Josey6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesShelby Plotkin vs Tayra Ward4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Katherine Polk / Kelly Roark vs Kimberly Buzbee / Sarah Rahim6-4, 6-3
2026-04-09vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Katherine Polk / Nicole Fitzpatrick vs Laurie Damron / Rose Cabato4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Bloomquist / Bailey Benham vs Catherine Mower / Karen Orgill6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Roark / Carrie Woody vs Melanie Cox / Carissa Villaflor3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Currie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Dayton Schaefer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Kacie Price
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Anne Bloomquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Erika Braver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Bailey Benham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Shelby Plotkin
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.01
Kelly Roark
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.95
Carrie Woody
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Amanda Digney
usually #1 Doubles 22%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.17
Rachell Mariano
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Katie Nasr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Katherine Polk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Palmer
published
Nicole Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Katherine Polk + Bailey Benham5265% games+25.4% vs expected
Kacie Price + Erika Braver14263% games+16.8% vs expected
Erika Braver + Bailey Benham6264% games+13.4% vs expected
Katie Nasr + Mary Katherine Polk7454% games+10.0% vs expected
Nicole Fitzpatrick + Kacie Price6073% games+5.5% vs expected
Carrie Woody + Kelly Roark251060% games+3.0% vs expected
Nicole Fitzpatrick + Amanda Digney7069% games+2.8% vs expected
Kelly Roark + Katie Nasr1442% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Currie
52W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Dayton Schaefer
30W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kacie Price
57W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Anne Bloomquist
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
Erika Braver
28W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Bailey Benham
22W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Shelby Plotkin
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
Kelly Roark
91W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Carrie Woody
72W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Amanda Digney
40W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Rachell Mariano
68W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Katie Nasr
90W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mary Katherine Polk
25W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Palmer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Fitzpatrick
52W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.