Teams

FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-18vs Betty'sLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Rahim / Kimberly Buzbee vs Bailey Benham / Nicole Fitzpatrick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMallory Marlin vs Rachell Mariano6-2, 3-0
L#2 DoublesStevie Josey / Natica Smith vs Kacie Price / Allison Currie0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEllabeth Strack vs Mary Palmer3-6, 0-6
2026-06-05vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesAshley Wise / Stevie Josey vs Catherine Mower / Laurie Damron3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEllabeth Strack vs Annamae Norman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatica Smith / Tayra Ward vs Melanie Cox / Carissa Villaflor1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Seay vs Haley Morgan6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Buzbee / Caitlyn Sagraves vs Karen Orgill / Emily Hall6-7, 3-6
2026-05-28vs Betty'sLost 23
L#1 DoublesEmily Pomeroy / Caitlyn Sagraves vs Anne Bloomquist / Bailey Benham5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTayra Ward vs Amanda Johnson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdisha Tamrakar / Natica Smith vs Kacie Price / Kelly Roark2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Seay vs Shelby Plotkin1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSarah Rahim / Kimberly Buzbee vs Dayton Schaefer / Mary Palmer6-4, 6-4
2026-05-15vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Pomeroy / Caitlyn Sagraves vs Carissa Villaflor / Catherine Mower1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTayra Ward vs Annamae Norman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Wise / Adisha Tamrakar vs Emily Hall / Laurie Damron4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMallory Marlin / Ashley Seay vs Haley Morgan / Libby Hillis3-6, 5-7
2026-05-02vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Pomeroy / Addison Miller vs Kylie Clark / Annamae Norman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Wise / Stevie Josey vs Carissa Villaflor / Catherine Mower4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Buzbee / Tayra Ward vs Emily Hall / Angie Koumaris6-3, 6-4
2026-04-16vs Betty'sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEllabeth Strack / Stevie Josey vs Erika Braver / Bailey Benham2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTayra Ward vs Shelby Plotkin6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKimberly Buzbee / Sarah Rahim vs Mary Katherine Polk / Kelly Roark4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNatica Smith / Mallory Marlin vs Amanda Digney / Rachell Mariano6-4, 6-4
2026-04-02vs OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesKimberly Buzbee / Sarah Rahim vs Libby Hillis / Emily Hall6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEllabeth Strack vs Haley Morgan3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Seay / Stevie Josey vs Carissa Villaflor / Catherine Mower1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMallory Marlin vs Kylie Clark6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAdisha Tamrakar / Natica Smith vs De'Aun Sandvig / Katie Turner2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Sandvig/18&over4.5W80271330292
2FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME07112449353

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Addison Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Stevie Josey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.87
Ellabeth Strack
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.87
Mallory Marlin
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.84
Caitlyn Sagraves
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Emily Pomeroy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Ashley Seay
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Jacqualine Bufford
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Kimberly Buzbee
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Natica Smith
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Tayra Ward
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.48
Adisha Tamrakar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Sarah Rahim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Buzbee + Jacqualine Bufford9160% games+2.0% vs expected
Jacqualine Bufford + Natica Smith7259% games+1.7% vs expected
Caitlyn Sagraves + Emily Pomeroy1435% games−5.9% vs expected
Kimberly Buzbee + Sarah Rahim3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Addison Miller
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
Stevie Josey
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.92
Ellabeth Strack
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Mallory Marlin
23W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4.5
Caitlyn Sagraves
19W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84
Emily Pomeroy
42W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ashley Seay
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Jacqualine Bufford
81W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Kimberly Buzbee
70W–40L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
Natica Smith
59W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Tayra Ward
23W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Adisha Tamrakar
3W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Sarah Rahim
54W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.