Teams

Hempfield - Covell

2022 USTA 55 & Over League · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-13vs RCW - ScottWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeeAnn Palmer / Nancy Opilo vs Pat Giles / Stacy Gould6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Tully / Lisa Stokes vs Linda Scott / Madonna Hufnagel6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebora Covell / Karen Schaufert vs Lori Hunt / Nina Beecher6-4, 6-3
2022-07-06vs Wisehaven - BeckWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeeAnn Palmer / Michele Mccartney vs Bonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Tully / Lisa Stokes vs Lynne Beck / Karen Sipe7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Crosetto / Joan Steinhardt vs Julie Schedin / Sheryl Stoll6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs RCW - GroffWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Schaufert / Lori Tully vs Nancy Henry / Joy Rynier6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Opilo / Michele Mccartney vs Kimberly Frey / Tia Tedder6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebora Covell / Patricia Lawrence vs Lucinda Mauro / Brenda Moran6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs Hempfield - Hangen55Won 30
W#1 DoublesLori Tully / Karen Schaufert vs Jennifer Rakoczy / Alexandra Short3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Stokes / Joan Steinhardt vs Susanne Nimmrichter / Gretchen Little6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebora Covell / Patricia Lawrence vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-04vs Hershey - SoulliardWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Mccartney / Lisa Stokes vs Ellen Stoute / Shannon Corcoran6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Schaufert / Lori Tully vs Sue Shema / Sheri Landis6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebora Covell / Joan Steinhardt vs Meg Rogers / Lois Jernigan6-4, 6-1
2022-05-25vs Hempfield - WengerWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Opilo / LeeAnn Palmer vs Katherine Granbois / Catherine Ingram6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Stokes / Karen Schaufert vs Diana Yeagley / Betsy Wenger6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrenda Crosetto / Patricia Lawrence vs Joanne Hess / Phyllis Bouder0-6, 2-6
2022-05-19vs Hempfield - SchlageterWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeeAnn Palmer / Michele Mccartney vs Barbara Newman / Teresa Clark6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Stokes / Nancy Opilo vs Tracy Schmitt / Dale Heird6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Schaufert / Lori Tully vs Kristin Schlageter / Stephanie Zuckerman6-0, 6-1
2022-05-04vs West Shore- WilfongWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Tully / Nancy Opilo vs Karen Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Stokes / Karen Schaufert vs Linda Snider / Cindy Wilfong6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Lawrence / Brenda Crosetto vs Karis Hazam / Sara Nicholas6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
LeeAnn Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Lori Tully
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.89
Michele Mccartney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Patricia Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Karen Schaufert
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.77
Nancy Opilo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Debora Covell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Joan Steinhardt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Brenda Crosetto
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Lisa Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Opilo + LeeAnn Palmer10263% games+13.8% vs expected
Patricia Lawrence + Lisa Stokes7261% games+8.3% vs expected
Patricia Lawrence + Lori Tully16465% games+7.6% vs expected
Lori Tully + Lisa Stokes18460% games+5.5% vs expected
Karen Schaufert + Debora Covell35963% games+5.3% vs expected
Karen Schaufert + LeeAnn Palmer21759% games+4.8% vs expected
Nancy Opilo + Patricia Lawrence7260% games+4.3% vs expected
Nancy Opilo + Michele Mccartney462358% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
LeeAnn Palmer
79W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Lori Tully
283W–135L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Michele Mccartney
289W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Patricia Lawrence
153W–121L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Karen Schaufert
238W–117L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Nancy Opilo
334W–191L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debora Covell
128W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Joan Steinhardt
93W–135L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Brenda Crosetto
111W–142L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
Lisa Stokes
68W–46L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.