Teams

AGraves

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-11vs CRobayo 4.0Split 11
W#2 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Suyeon Kim6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Gillian Kelleher6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-08-04vs DLapeWon 20
W#1 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Button Hall6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLisa Kempf vs Deanna Lape6-2, 6-0
2022-07-21vs KRiceSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJeme Avent vs Kristin Sobey7-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLisa Kempf vs Jacqueline Wolborsky3-6, 4-6
2022-07-14vs EMcAllisterSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Janelle Howard6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLisa Kempf vs ROBIN Lamb6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-30vs DLapeLost 01
L#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Sara Velarde6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs CRobayo 4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLisa Kempf vs Suyeon Kim2-6, 1-6
2022-06-16Lost 01
L#2 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Elizabeth Minto4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-09vs EMcAllisterWon 20
W#2 SinglesElena Pinkus vs Heather Jayson6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJeme Avent vs ROBIN Lamb6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Allison Graves
published 4.5
3.84
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.82
Elena Pinkus
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Jeme Avent
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.70
Stephanie Whiting
published
3.60
Kimberly Patrey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Yvette LeGrande
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Lisa Kempf
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Jeme Avent16855% games+5.8% vs expected
Kimberly Patrey + Jeme Avent14758% games+2.1% vs expected
Kimberly Patrey + Lisa Kempf12756% games−6.0% vs expected
Elena Pinkus + Lisa Kempf4361% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Graves
38W–20L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Carolyn Lee
35W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Elena Pinkus
124W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Jeme Avent
297W–148L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Stephanie Whiting
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Kimberly Patrey
238W–186L career · 1 line in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–140L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Lisa Kempf
367W–302L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.