Teams

Crane Creakers

2021 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-07vs SpoilersLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnthony Olbrich / James Wear vs John Westover / Milorad Papic1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Sparks / Joe Caroselli vs Glen Stein / Ralph Butler7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-06-28vs SpoilersLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Sauer / Nick Koontz vs John Westover / Milorad Papic1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Novak / Brian Taggart vs Robert Speers / Harry Westover2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBill Agler / Anthony Olbrich vs Orlando Ciniglio / Alex Westfall3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-23vs Have FunWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Novak / Brian Taggart vs Bill Fritz / Christopher Dirstine6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs Old EnoughLost 03
L#1 DoublesNick Koontz / James Wear vs John Chavez / Steven Garcia1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Taggart / Charles Novak vs Craig Mello / Derrick O'Neill2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoe Caroselli / Jan Schiedel vs David Umberger / Kirk Whittaker1-6, 4-6
2021-06-14vs Older Than DirtLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Wear / Nick Koontz vs James Elliott / Anthony Saulino0-6, 0-6
2021-06-07vs Have FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Novak / Anthony Olbrich vs John Capobres / Phillip Bowden1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Caroselli / James Wear vs Bill Fritz / Shane Noaker6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-06-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Agler / Brian Taggart vs Jonathan Bloomer / Steven Buchanan2-6, 1-6
2021-05-24vs Older Than DirtLost 02
L#1 DoublesRussell Sauer / Nick Koontz vs James Elliott / Anthony Saulino3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Wear / Anthony Olbrich vs Christopher Lind / Darrell Ludders0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Old Enough7119511166
2Older Than Dirt6217716170
3Spoilers2671737247
4Crane Creakers1742043268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Bryan Dingel
published 4
3.32
Charles Novak
published 3.5
3.27
Tim Collias
published 3.5
3.12
Jan Schiedel
published
2.83
Bill Agler
published 3
David Sparks
published 3
James Wear
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.25
Anthony Olbrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Brian Taggart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Joe Caroselli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nick Koontz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Russell Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Sparks + Anthony Olbrich01019% games−14.3% vs expected
David Sparks + Joe Caroselli2649% gamesnot enough data
Charles Novak + Brian Taggart2438% gamesnot enough data
Charles Novak + Russell Sauer0628% gamesnot enough data
Bill Agler + Nick Koontz2434% gamesnot enough data
Bryan Dingel + Russell Sauer0634% gamesnot enough data
Bill Agler + Anthony Olbrich2347% gamesnot enough data
Nick Koontz + Anthony Olbrich314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Dingel
105W–134L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Charles Novak
26W–53L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Tim Collias
18W–25L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Jan Schiedel
65W–59L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Bill Agler
82W–102L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
David Sparks
46W–91L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
James Wear
4W–43L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Anthony Olbrich
38W–99L career · 4 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.25
Brian Taggart
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Joe Caroselli
6W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nick Koontz
79W–160L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Russell Sauer
54W–99L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.