Teams

LA - Ladybugs

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesAngelica Weaver vs Caitlin Neuville2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-08vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesAngelica Weaver vs Val Escobar6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-31vs LA - Mooney Mates 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesAngelica Weaver vs Bridget Best6-2, 6-2
2025-05-17vs LA - Mulholland DriversWon 10
W#1 SinglesAngelica Weaver vs Kay Cannon3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-04vs LA - JBeesWon 10
W#1 SinglesAngelica Weaver vs Sara Herta6-3, 7-5
2025-04-19vs LA - Dare DoublesWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Watson / Heidi Reed vs Brooke Horowitz / Diane Wagner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine O'Neal / Vy Bui vs Eleanor DeMartino / Liz Rosman7-6, 3-2
W#3 DoublesLuz Herrera / Randi Robins vs Lynn Loeb / Diana Nyad6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Angelica Weaver
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Sally Ngo
published
2.92
Christine O'Neal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
2.87
ARI KIM
published 3
2.80
Heidi Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
2.77
Alyssa Binczyk
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Randi Robins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Vy Bui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Luz Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Melinda Martinez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Binczyk + ARI KIM2445% gamesnot enough data
Aisha Conner-Gaten + Vy Bui314 matchesnot enough data
Luz Herrera + Christine O'Neal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelica Weaver
29W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Sally Ngo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Christine O'Neal
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Aisha Conner-Gaten
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
ARI KIM
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Heidi Reed
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Alexandra Carrethers
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Alyssa Binczyk
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Randi Robins
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Vy Bui
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Luz Herrera
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.38
Melinda Martinez
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.