Teams

LA - Mulholland Drivers

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.11 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-07vs LA - Lady AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Kathleen Hipps vs Armani Martin / Lea Taylor6-2, 6-4
2025-05-17vs LA - LadybugsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnisha Pattanaik / Kathleen Hipps vs Christine Watson / Heidi Reed7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-19vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 3.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKathleen Hipps vs Jennifer Sung1-6, 2-6
2025-04-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesKathleen Hipps vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Anisha Pattanaik
published 3.5
3.25
Kay Cannon
published
3.18
Kathleen Hipps
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Jenna O'rourke
published
3.01
Jamie Nassour
published 3
2.97
Susan Carter Hall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Amy Chozick
published 3
2.80
Maya Lebenzon
published
2.79
Andi Schoffman
published 3
Elizabeth Queen
published 3
Evelyn Taft
published 3
Isabelle March
published 3
2.71
Andrea Bardack
published 3
2.62
Suzanne Sergile
published
Lenore Zerman
published
Wendy Magdlen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Bardack + Maya Lebenzon4354% games+10.3% vs expected
Kathleen Hipps + Anisha Pattanaik4749% games+0.8% vs expected
Anisha Pattanaik + Kay Cannon404 matchesnot enough data
Maya Lebenzon + Andi Schoffman224 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Bardack + Andi Schoffman123 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Bardack + Susan Carter Hall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anisha Pattanaik
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Kay Cannon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Kathleen Hipps
78W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Jenna O'rourke
18W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Jamie Nassour
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Susan Carter Hall
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Amy Chozick
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Maya Lebenzon
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Andi Schoffman
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Elizabeth Queen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Evelyn Taft
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Isabelle March
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrea Bardack
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Suzanne Sergile
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Lenore Zerman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Magdlen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.