Teams

CPV BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs CACI REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesBradford Smith / Bill Aplin vs Stanley Pritchet / Edward Budd6-2, 6-3
2023-07-10vs CR-DC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs Ralph Yatsko6-2, 1-0
2023-06-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs George Ansfield6-1, 6-0
2023-06-25vs WC GOLDWon 10
W#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs Brad Mosch6-2, 6-2
2023-06-19vs CCV BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs Jason Abrams2-6, 6-7
2023-06-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesBill Aplin vs David Schwartz6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Bill Aplin
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.83
Andrew Boutilier
published 3
2.69
Carsten Hannen
published 3
2.55
Pete Rather
published
2.51
Kevin Manion
published
2.50
Charles Skinner
published 3
2.50
Travis McNeil
published
2.48
Bradford Smith
published 3
2.48
Jon Sutherland
published
2.40
David Markowski
published 3
2.35
Brandon Short
published 2.5
Rob Marchant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Manion + Pete Rather2445% games−7.4% vs expected
Carsten Hannen + Andrew Boutilier224 matchesnot enough data
Pete Rather + Brandon Short134 matchesnot enough data
Charles Skinner + Kevin Manion123 matchesnot enough data
Charles Skinner + Brandon Short123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Aplin
72W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Andrew Boutilier
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Carsten Hannen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
Pete Rather
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Kevin Manion
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Charles Skinner
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Travis McNeil
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Bradford Smith
4W–20L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.48
Jon Sutherland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
David Markowski
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.40
2.5
Brandon Short
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.35
Rob Marchant
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.