Teams

EE:Wimble

2026 VT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women Flight 1

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJudith Wimble / Lori Roberts vs Laura Cawley / Laura Williams4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeShan Foret / Kathleen Toto vs Edye Graning / Sarah Ellis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Cunningham / Maja Smith vs Alana Lowry / Martha Small0-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Pamela Clapp vs Laura Williams / Laura Cawley3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Lisa Strausser7-6, 5-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeShan Foret / Kate Cunningham vs Page Frantz / Deborah Shaw3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Kirkpatrick / Kathleen Toto vs Vivianne Ivanier / Shona Mossey-Lothrop0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDeShan Foret / Lori Roberts vs Deborah Shaw / Laura Williams7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMary Beth Pinard vs Lindsay Repka6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Kathleen Toto vs Edye Graning / Martha Small1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaja Smith / Mary Kirkpatrick vs Carol Bouyea / Page Frantz0-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJudith Wimble / Mary Beth Pinard vs Edye Graning / Lisa Strausser6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeggy Cohen / Mary Kirkpatrick vs Shona Mossey-Lothrop / Deborah Shaw5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Cunningham / Kathleen Toto vs Vivianne Ivanier / Cindy Fonseca0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDeShan Foret / Pamela Clapp vs Laura Williams / Laura Cawley3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Cindy Fonseca7-6, 5-3
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Pinard / Lori Roberts vs Edye Graning / Martha Small7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Kathleen Toto vs Vivianne Ivanier / Alana Lowry6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-17vs ESB:Kicking Aces:Strausser/WilliamsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPamela Clapp / DeShan Foret vs Sarah Ellis / Martha Small6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Beth Pinard vs Laura Williams6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Toto / Kate Cunningham vs Edye Graning / Page Frantz6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaja Smith / Peggy Cohen vs Deborah Shaw / Carol Bouyea4-6, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Judith Wimble
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Pamela Clapp
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
DeShan Foret
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Mary Beth Pinard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Kathleen Toto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Peggy Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Kate Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Mary Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Maja Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Jenna Bisset
published
Megan Shrestha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kirkpatrick + Peggy Cohen123 matchesnot enough data
Maja Smith + Kate Cunningham213 matchesnot enough data
Kate Cunningham + Mary Beth Pinard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Wimble
17W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Pamela Clapp
40W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
DeShan Foret
7W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Mary Beth Pinard
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathleen Toto
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Peggy Cohen
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Kate Cunningham
45W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
Mary Kirkpatrick
32W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Maja Smith
20W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Jenna Bisset
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Shrestha
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.