Teams

ESB:Kicking Aces:Strausser/Williams

2026 VT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women Flight 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-04vs EE:WimbleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLaura Cawley / Laura Williams vs Judith Wimble / Lori Roberts6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLindsay Repka vs Megan Shrestha7-5, 2-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdye Graning / Sarah Ellis vs DeShan Foret / Kathleen Toto7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlana Lowry / Martha Small vs Kate Cunningham / Maja Smith6-0, 7-5
2026-03-22vs EE:WimbleWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Williams / Laura Cawley vs Megan Shrestha / Pamela Clapp6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Strausser vs Judith Wimble6-7, 6-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPage Frantz / Deborah Shaw vs DeShan Foret / Kate Cunningham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVivianne Ivanier / Shona Mossey-Lothrop vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Kathleen Toto6-0, 6-3
2026-03-14vs EE:WimbleWon 31
W#1 DoublesDeborah Shaw / Laura Williams vs DeShan Foret / Lori Roberts5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsay Repka vs Mary Beth Pinard4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdye Graning / Martha Small vs Peggy Cohen / Kathleen Toto6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Bouyea / Page Frantz vs Maja Smith / Mary Kirkpatrick6-0, 6-3
2026-02-28vs EE:WimbleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesEdye Graning / Lisa Strausser vs Judith Wimble / Mary Beth Pinard4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLaura Cawley vs Megan Shrestha1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShona Mossey-Lothrop / Deborah Shaw vs Peggy Cohen / Mary Kirkpatrick7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVivianne Ivanier / Cindy Fonseca vs Kate Cunningham / Kathleen Toto6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs EE:WimbleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Williams / Laura Cawley vs DeShan Foret / Pamela Clapp6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEdye Graning / Martha Small vs Mary Beth Pinard / Lori Roberts6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVivianne Ivanier / Alana Lowry vs Megan Shrestha / Kathleen Toto6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-01-17vs EE:WimbleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Ellis / Martha Small vs Pamela Clapp / DeShan Foret4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEdye Graning / Page Frantz vs Kathleen Toto / Kate Cunningham1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Shaw / Carol Bouyea vs Maja Smith / Peggy Cohen6-4, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women Flight 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Kicking Aces:Strausser/Williams06131126201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Laura Cawley
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.34
Page Frantz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Alana Lowry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Strausser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Lindsay Repka
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Edye Graning
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Cindy Fonseca
published 3.5
3.24
Deborah Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Vivianne Ivanier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Martha Small
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Carol Bouyea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Sarah Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shona Mossey-Lothrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Strausser + Laura Cawley8067% games+15.5% vs expected
Lisa Strausser + Carol Bouyea1435% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Strausser + Edye Graning044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Strausser + Deborah Shaw314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Cawley + Page Frantz314 matchesnot enough data
Shona Mossey-Lothrop + Deborah Shaw224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Cawley
58W–23L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
Page Frantz
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Alana Lowry
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Lisa Strausser
64W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Lindsay Repka
21W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Edye Graning
37W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Fonseca
21W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Shaw
21W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Vivianne Ivanier
34W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Martha Small
41W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Carol Bouyea
22W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Sarah Ellis
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Shona Mossey-Lothrop
50W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.