Teams

Beerman Bullhitters - M. Bull

2024 Polk (NA) Casual League · 3.5 Plus

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2024-12-12Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLaurie Grieger / Karen Bateman vs Ann Marie Toney / Rose Coulton0-6, 1-6
2024-11-20Lost 02
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Tessie Beltran vs Amanda Smith / Rachel Ray1-6, 2-6
L#5 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Desiree Tchipanova / Allison Sorenson5-7, 3-6
2024-11-15Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Geraldine Tardy / Debra Edwards1-6, 4-6
2024-11-13Lost 01
L#4 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Brittany Craig / Janet Layug2-6, 0-6
2024-10-30vs LCC - L. WidickWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Margaret Huggins vs Jaimi Miller / Lisa Moseley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-23Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Kathy Borders / Meghan Savant5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-18vs Beerman Smart Aces - N. GiustoLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Tessie Beltran vs Angie Shoemaker / Jennifer Spann1-6, 0-6
2024-10-02vs City of Winter Haven - J. EdwardsLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Jackie Edwards / Ann Rainer2-6, 3-6
2024-09-25vs LCC - L. WidickLost 01
L#4 Female DoublesGinger Davis / Karen Bateman vs Tiffany Osler Kilpatrick / Lauren Clark2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-18Split 11
L#3 Female DoublesGinger Davis / Karen Bateman vs Meghan Savant / Kathy Borders3-6, 2-6
W#4 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Courtney McCrystal / Tyra Hunt6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-11vs Beerman Smart Aces - N. GiustoSplit 11
W#4 Female DoublesGinger Davis / Karen Bateman vs Nathaly Arredondo / Bettye Sykes6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#5 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Regina Espitia vs Desiree Tchipanova / Cynthia Hallock2-6, 2-6
2024-09-05Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesJennifer Brinson / Karen Bateman vs Lizette Murphy / Jaimi Miller2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Tessie Beltran vs Angela Johnson / Leslie Simmons3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Laurie Grieger vs Teresa Osborn / Brandye Pickering1-6, 0-6
2024-08-28Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Jennifer Brinson vs Sandy Ramsey / Debra Edwards6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-14Lost 02
L#3 Female DoublesMargaret Huggins / Aroma Taicher vs Monica Trujillo / Jenilee Coconato3-6, 1-4
L#4 Female DoublesKaren Bateman / Ginger Davis vs Marley McAdams / Kathy Borders7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Plus have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Tessie Beltran
usually #1 Female Doubles 47%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published
3.21
Anna Previte
usually #2 Female Doubles 59%, also #1 Female Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.14
Melanie Langley
published
3.02
Melissa Darch
usually #2 Female Doubles 77%, also #1 Female Doubles 12% · published 3.5
2.96
Ginger Davis
usually #1 Female Doubles 37%, also #4 Female Doubles 32% · published
2.91
Karen Hogg
usually #1 Female Doubles 53%, also #4 Female Doubles 18% · published 3
2.83
Karen Bateman
usually #3 Female Doubles 64%, also #4 Female Doubles 27% · published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.78
Elizabeth Paul
published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.59
Julie Goodwin
published
Margaret Huggins
usually #3 Female Doubles 40%, also #4 Female Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Darch + Anna Previte211750% games+9.1% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Anna Previte8357% games+9.0% vs expected
Ginger Davis + Anna Previte17757% games+7.6% vs expected
Tessie Beltran + Karen Hogg4751% games+6.2% vs expected
Karen Bateman + Tessie Beltran4543% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Melissa Darch3451% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Karen Bateman2448% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Huggins + Karen Bateman1433% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tessie Beltran
67W–80L career · 17 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Anna Previte
99W–73L career · 22 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Melanie Langley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · 17 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 19 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 16 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Karen Bateman
39W–65L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Elizabeth Paul
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
Margaret Huggins
7W–35L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.