Teams

DEREK MIRELES

2026 SETX 40 & Over · 4.0 Men 40 & OVER

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-12vs IDORENYIN LUKEWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Cobb / Alberto C Elefano vs Idorenyin Luke / Stephen Grohn6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAaron Ruppel vs Xinyu Liu6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGlen Morgan / Daniel White vs James Raymond / Randall Vayon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-05vs IDORENYIN LUKEWon 31
W#1 DoublesGary Cobb / Craig Fox vs Dana Hanning / Stephen Grohn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAaron Ruppel vs Idorenyin Luke2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGlen Morgan / Daniel White vs Charlie Foxworth / Xinyu Liu3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDerek Mireles / Alberto C Elefano vs Charles Heare / John Hawa6-0, 7-5
2026-02-26vs IDORENYIN LUKEWon 30
W#1 DoublesGary Cobb / Daniel White vs Dana Hanning / Stephen Grohn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDerek Mireles / Aaron Ruppel vs Charlie Foxworth / Russell Mires6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCraig Fox / Alberto C Elefano vs Idorenyin Luke / Charles Heare6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DEREK MIRELES309310100

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Craig Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Gary Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Aaron Ruppel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Alberto C Elefano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Glen Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alberto C Elefano + Gary Cobb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Fox
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gary Cobb
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Aaron Ruppel
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Alberto C Elefano
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Glen Morgan
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.