Teams

IDORENYIN LUKE

2026 SETX 40 & Over · 4.0 Men 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-12vs DEREK MIRELESSplit 22
L#1 DoublesIdorenyin Luke / Stephen Grohn vs Gary Cobb / Alberto C Elefano3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesXinyu Liu vs Aaron Ruppel2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Raymond / Randall Vayon vs Glen Morgan / Daniel White3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Foxworth / Russell Mires vs Derek Mireles / Mark McCoy6-2, 7-5
2026-03-05vs DEREK MIRELESLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Hanning / Stephen Grohn vs Gary Cobb / Craig Fox5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIdorenyin Luke vs Aaron Ruppel6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlie Foxworth / Xinyu Liu vs Glen Morgan / Daniel White6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCharles Heare / John Hawa vs Derek Mireles / Alberto C Elefano0-6, 5-7
2026-02-26vs DEREK MIRELESLost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Hanning / Stephen Grohn vs Gary Cobb / Daniel White7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJames Raymond vs Mark McCoy2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCharlie Foxworth / Russell Mires vs Derek Mireles / Aaron Ruppel3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIdorenyin Luke / Charles Heare vs Craig Fox / Alberto C Elefano1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Stephen Grohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Randall Vayon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Dana Hanning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Xinyu Liu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
John Hawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Idorenyin Luke
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.40
Charlie Foxworth
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.32
Russell Mires
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
James Raymond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Charles Heare
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randall Vayon + Dana Hanning224 matchesnot enough data
Charlie Foxworth + Russell Mires213 matchesnot enough data
Dana Hanning + Stephen Grohn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Grohn
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Randall Vayon
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Dana Hanning
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Xinyu Liu
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
John Hawa
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.43
Idorenyin Luke
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Charlie Foxworth
21W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Russell Mires
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
James Raymond
14W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Charles Heare
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.