Teams

SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-04vs CUPERTINO SC 40MX7.0CSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPegah Seddighian / Jiajing Wang vs Ying Zhang / James Mercado6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaule Kodjou / MIchael Repinski vs Amanda Kao / Vikas Shah1-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs CUPERTINO SC 40MX7.0CLost 02
L#2 DoublesSailesh Rachabathuni / Paule Kodjou vs Aiko Murakami / Ashish Bodke2-6, 3-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Brunkhorst / Alice Isaacson vs Kumiko Takamatsu / Anthony Do6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Peter Dollinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Al Linke
published 4
Arren Smoot
published 4
3.56
Pegah Seddighian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Robert Brunkhorst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Rita Sandhu
published
3.41
MIchael Repinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jiajing Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Eric Chu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Volga B Calvello
published
3.13
Alice Isaacson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Brant Armstrong
published 3.5
2.92
Sailaja Brahmandam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Jeanne Oxford
published
2.79
Mei See
published
Paule Kodjou
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Volga B Calvello + Eric Chu213 matchesnot enough data
Pegah Seddighian + Jiajing Wang123 matchesnot enough data
MIchael Repinski + Paule Kodjou123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Dollinger
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.94
4
Al Linke
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arren Smoot
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pegah Seddighian
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Robert Brunkhorst
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Rita Sandhu
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
MIchael Repinski
5W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jiajing Wang
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Eric Chu
11W–16L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Volga B Calvello
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Alice Isaacson
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brant Armstrong
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Sailaja Brahmandam
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jeanne Oxford
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
Mei See
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Paule Kodjou
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.