Teams

Burke/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women - Wed AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs Kumar/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Hipp / Lisa Jagar vs Nina Kumar / Lauren Wideman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Frankel Nau / Jessica Northington vs Sheryl Carmack / Amy Hirt4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCeci Billington / Patty Bea Presley vs Brooke Prince / Alix Cross6-3, 7-5
2026-07-08vs Fisher/Bateman/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Robbins / Dana Hipp vs Victoria Lubnik / Mary Katherine Seibels6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Pattison / Maggie Stockton vs NICOLE BATEMAN / Lori McClurg2-6, 5-7
2026-06-24vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Jagar / Maggie Stockton vs Lissa Vestevich / Kelly Montgomery6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLibby Burke / Amy Frankel Nau vs Erin McMurtray / Jenny Stoebner3-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesLibby Burke / Maggie Stockton vs Veronica Pulley / MaryBeth Comfort6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-10vs Tramontin/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Robbins / Lisa Jagar vs Kim Blakley / Stephanie Buhalis6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Northington / Maggie Stockton vs Roxanne Ellwanger / Ami Simons6-3, 6-0
2026-06-03vs Osborne/NashvileLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Jagar / Nikki Turitto vs Laura Woodard / Sara Ludlam3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLibby Burke / Jill Talbert vs Mitsuyo Suzuki / Jennifer Drinnon4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatty Bea Presley / Allison Harris vs Jackie Osborne / Sarah Esposito4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women - Wed AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile5113512127
2Fisher/Bateman/Nashville5112612103
3Osborne/Nashvile4211719158
4Burke/Nashville2481023172
5Cox/Webb/Nashville2481024175
6Sanford/Nashville2471124178
7Tramontin/Nashville1521633204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Dana Hipp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Jagar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Nikki Turitto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Graham Bratton
published
2.86
Amy Frankel Nau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jill Talbert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Maggie Stockton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Jocelyn Chambers
published
2.61
Catherine Pattison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Libby Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jessica Northington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Patty Bea Presley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Hipp
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Lisa Jagar
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Nikki Turitto
21W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Graham Bratton
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Amy Frankel Nau
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Jill Talbert
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Maggie Stockton
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jocelyn Chambers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Catherine Pattison
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Libby Burke
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jessica Northington
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Patty Bea Presley
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.