Teams

Sanford/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women - Wed AM

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-15vs Robinson/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaria Broussard / Karen Martin vs Abigail Regan / Hayley Robinson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTara Platt / Anna West vs Kathryn Jalovec / Hillary Howorth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Prater / Miyuki Fowler vs Elizabeth Tipton / Rachel Devries5-7, 2-6
2026-07-08vs Cox/Webb/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCristina Forras / Penelope Sevier vs Heather Cook / Jennifer Frank6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Anna West vs Orly Cohen / Cindy Lee6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElisa Romans / Megan Palmer vs Jessica Hazel / Kristan Schiedemeyer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Monte/Spittle/NasvhiileLost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Godsil / Penelope Sevier vs Jessie Seaman / Megan McDugald1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Emily Moore vs Kaelin Cramer / Heather Gillum6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnna West / Janine Hopkins vs EMILY MARTIN / Mary Elizabeth Armor5-7, 3-6
2026-06-17vs Stemmler/NashvilleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElisa Romans / Janine Hopkins vs Rachel Walker / Katy Miller1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Moore / Elizabeth Prater vs Whitney Kemp / Lindsay Logan6-3, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Robinson/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Tara Platt vs Kathryn Jalovec / Hayley Robinson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMiyuki Fowler / Megan Palmer vs Holly Barnhart / Amy Montgomery2-6, 4-6
2026-06-05vs Cox/Webb/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Broussard / Penelope Sevier vs Ellen Gooden / Donna Cox1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Blankenship / Alicia Herrera vs Cristin Webb / Cindy Lee3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Prater / Emily Moore vs Marcy Mickiewicz / Tia Aryal3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women - Wed AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Monte/Spittle/Nasvhiile5113512127
2Fisher/Bateman/Nashville5112612103
3Osborne/Nashvile4211719158
4Burke/Nashville2481023172
5Cox/Webb/Nashville2481024175
6Sanford/Nashville2471124178
7Tramontin/Nashville1521633204

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Maria Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Penelope Sevier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Shannon Godsil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Jelena Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy Blankenship
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Alicia Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Janine Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Elisa Romans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Anna West
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Megan Palmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Elizabeth Prater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Miyuki Fowler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Broussard
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Penelope Sevier
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Shannon Godsil
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jelena Sanford
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Cathy Blankenship
39W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Alicia Herrera
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Janine Hopkins
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Elisa Romans
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Anna West
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Megan Palmer
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Elizabeth Prater
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Miyuki Fowler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.