Teams

GTC-Whisenhunt

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-26vs VAC-RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaileen Walz / Betsy Whisenhunt vs Nattarudee Palalikit / Thuy Nguyen2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoelle Dixon vs Angela Gano3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJodene Calvary / Jennifer Weber vs Paige Rogers / Evelyn Savarin6-4, 6-2
2021-06-19vs VAC-RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJodene Calvary / Maileen Walz vs Lisa Thornton / Thuy Nguyen1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoelle Dixon vs Lacy Fehrenbach1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Grice / Jennifer Weber vs Sarah Ryan / Maria Rogers1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-13vs VAC-RyanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Whisenhunt / Jennifer Weber vs Nattarudee Palalikit / Lisa Thornton2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJodene Calvary / Joelle Dixon vs Maria Rogers / Veronika Graham6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-05vs VAC-RyanSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoelle Dixon vs Lacy Fehrenbach2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBetsy Whisenhunt / Maileen Walz vs Mi Ae Kim / Kristine Cramer7-5, 5-4
2021-05-23vs VAC-RyanLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebi Bruss Lemke / Maileen Walz vs Paige Rogers / Evelyn Savarin2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoelle Dixon vs Sarah Ryan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaphne MacKey / Betsy Whisenhunt vs Nattarudee Palalikit / Lisa Thornton4-6, 2-6
2021-05-16vs VAC-RyanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJodene Calvary / Betsy Whisenhunt vs Sarah Ryan / Lacy Fehrenbach1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDebi Bruss Lemke / Jennifer Weber vs Mi Ae Kim / Veronika Graham6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GTC-Whisenhunt0651328191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Joelle Dixon
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Jennifer Weber
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Maileen Walz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Daphne MacKey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Betsy Whisenhunt
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daphne MacKey + Betsy Whisenhunt2344% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Weber + Betsy Whisenhunt134 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Whisenhunt + Maileen Walz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joelle Dixon
64W–40L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Jennifer Weber
52W–69L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Maileen Walz
82W–161L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Daphne MacKey
4W–15L career · type M · 1 line in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.36
2.5
Betsy Whisenhunt
32W–79L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.