Teams

TING.Kim

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-26vs ACP.MurphyWon 10
W#2 SinglesYuna Kim vs Bridgett Murphy5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-21vs TOC.LeahySplit 11
L#1 SinglesTheresa Crone vs Heather Ingram2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesYuna Kim vs Lisa Goodman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-16vs TING.WhiteSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTheresa Crone vs Sarah London2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesYuna Kim vs Renata Yakobov6-3, 6-2
2025-07-14vs MD.WeberLost 02
L#1 SinglesTheresa Crone vs Katie Klingemann5-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesClaudia Bourbeau vs Caroline Stallings3-6, 0-6
2025-07-10vs CAS.HayesLost 02
L#1 SinglesTheresa Crone vs Jeannette Walker1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPaula Laine vs Jessica Patrick2-6, 0-6
2025-06-19vs TOC.GrasserLost 12
L#1 SinglesYuna Kim vs Kristen Henderson1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesClaudia Bourbeau vs Julie Newson1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTheresa Crone vs Tracy Grasser7-6, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Yuna Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Theresa Crone
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Cara Casuccio
published 2.5
2.52
Laura Robison
published
2.43
Claudia Bourbeau
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.36
Paula Laine
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Debbie Bednarcik
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Laine + Yuna Kim4352% gamesnot enough data
Laura Robison + Debbie Bednarcik213 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Bourbeau + Paula Laine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yuna Kim
121W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Theresa Crone
36W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Cara Casuccio
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Laura Robison
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
3
Claudia Bourbeau
35W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Paula Laine
63W–114L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Debbie Bednarcik
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.