Teams

KC-CC GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-15vs GAC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMiles Flesche / Dennis Greco vs Vic Alejandro / David Evans3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Lich / Ronald Kaufman vs Bruce Bendell / Mark Webster6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-08vs SS-HP ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDennis Greco / Walter Caamano vs Bill Lacock / Blake Palmer6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Dubetz / Thomas Lich vs Gerry Cabot / Lou Gobis6-4, 6-2
2023-06-01vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesMiles Flesche / George Turner vs Gary Beck / Gary Wussow1-6, 2-6
2023-05-25vs SS-H REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesWalter Caamano / Dennis Greco vs Paul Simon / Richard Yoke6-3, 6-3
2023-05-20vs GAC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Lich / Erhardt Werth vs Kevin Hall / Bruce Bendell6-7, 3-6
2023-05-18vs KC-CC YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesWade Blacketor / Miles Flesche vs Michael McClurkin / Joseph Rachwalski2-6, 1-6
2023-05-08vs SS-HP ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesWalter Caamano / Dennis Greco vs Robert Shaheen / Larry Christensen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Lich / Kirk Turner vs Robert Swander / Gerry Cabot6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
John Longo
published
3.46
Walter Caamano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kirk Turner
published
3.27
Miles Flesche
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Dan Griffiths
published 3.5
3.10
Thomas Lich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Ronald Kaufman
published
Pat Corbitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Longo + Walter Caamano12360% games+2.0% vs expected
Kirk Turner + Thomas Lich4945% games−4.6% vs expected
Dan Griffiths + Ronald Kaufman1431% gamesnot enough data
Pat Corbitt + Dan Griffiths044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Longo
51W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Walter Caamano
108W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Kirk Turner
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Miles Flesche
32W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dan Griffiths
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Thomas Lich
61W–81L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Ronald Kaufman
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.85
Pat Corbitt
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.