Teams

GAC NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-15vs KC-CC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVic Alejandro / David Evans vs Miles Flesche / Dennis Greco6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJim Gruber / Jay Sandstrom vs Dan Griffiths / Pat Corbitt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-08vs SKY BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJay Sandstrom / David Evans vs Ken McLagan / Terry Staples6-3, 6-0
2023-06-01vs KC-CC YELLOWLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Mervak / Michael Keirns vs Rick Roach / Ken Reed6-7, 3-6
2023-05-25vs SS-HP ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesVic Alejandro / Bruce Bendell vs William Evans / Robert Shaheen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Kevin Hall vs Gerry Cabot / Vladimir Kvasnica2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Keirns / Brian Mervak vs Norbert Frueh / Marty Bruno5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-05-20vs KC-CC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJay Toslosky / Vic Alejandro vs John Longo / George Turner6-1, 6-1
2023-05-04vs SKY BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesVic Alejandro / Allen Mulligan vs John Toaspern / Ken McLagan6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Keirns / Brian Mervak vs Barry Permut / Terry Staples4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Vic Alejandro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Russell Stewart
published
3.35
Bruce Bendell
published 3.5
Allen Mulligan
published 3.5
3.19
Brian Mervak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jay Sandstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Michael Keirns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jay Toslosky
published
Jim Gruber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Mervak + Michael Keirns3448% gamesnot enough data
Brian Mervak + Jay Sandstrom2441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vic Alejandro
63W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Russell Stewart
51W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Bruce Bendell
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Allen Mulligan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Mervak
58W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jay Sandstrom
60W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Michael Keirns
46W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jay Toslosky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Gruber
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.