Teams

PD18/Smith/FTC

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - PD · 3.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-03vs PD18/Braddock/HCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Rials / Joseph Protiva vs Gray Bryan / Zatavious Cotton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNing Wharton / Michael Rodriguez vs Jacob Coward / April Crawley7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Cheng / Cedrick Timmons vs Joseph Braddock / Grace Ford6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-02vs PD18/Turner/PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Rodriguez / Ning Wharton vs Naga Soumi Bijjala / Sharlyne Battle0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoseph Protiva / Madison Rials vs Josh Edington / Jenny Thigpen6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bailey / Celeste Wearing vs Donald Brunk / Jean Mcintosh4-6, 3-6
2025-07-26vs PD18/Braddock/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Kocherla / David Anderson vs Darrin St Ours / Marian Bunnell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Pittard / Nathan Saverance II vs Allen Grantham / Gray Bryan2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bailey / Celeste Wearing vs Elizabeth Hubbard / Zatavious Cotton2-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs PD18/Turner/PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Kocherla / David Anderson vs Jenny Thigpen / Chris Moody0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Pittard / Christopher Lewis vs Sean Flynn / Ayana Anderson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNing Wharton / Joseph Protiva vs Julien Weinberg / Jessica Weinberg6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs PD18/Braddock/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCeleste Wearing / Christopher Lewis vs Marian Bunnell / Joseph Braddock1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Rials / Joseph Protiva vs Bryant Peterson / Gray Bryan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Dynan / David Anderson vs April Crawley / Jacob Coward2-6, 3-6
2025-06-04vs PD18/Turner/PTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Rials / David Anderson vs Julien Weinberg / Jean Mcintosh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNing Wharton / Michael Rodriguez vs Donald Brunk / Tania Brunk6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Dynan / Cedrick Timmons vs Sean Flynn / Brooke Thibodaux6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Ning Wharton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Madison Rials
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Joseph Protiva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Cedrick Timmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Evelyn Goforth
published
2.63
Teresa Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Beth Dynan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Andrew Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Caitlin Kocherla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.01
Jessica Pittard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.97
Celeste Wearing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Michael Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nathan Saverance II
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Bailey + Celeste Wearing044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Rodriguez + Ning Wharton303 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Protiva + Madison Rials213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ning Wharton
53W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Madison Rials
27W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Joseph Protiva
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cedrick Timmons
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Evelyn Goforth
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Teresa Cheng
28W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
3
Beth Dynan
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Andrew Bailey
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
3
Caitlin Kocherla
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
Jessica Pittard
0W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.01
2.5
Celeste Wearing
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Michael Rodriguez
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Saverance II
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.