Teams

CHABOT CANYON 40AW4.0A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Noa Ramo-Larios
published
3.91
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.76
Kalliope Bellesis
published
3.69
Imelda Ho
published 4
3.67
Maureen Mcgrath
published
3.59
Val Swan
published
3.56
Melissa Abadia
published
3.56
Alexis Fasteau
published 4
3.48
Penny Anderson
published
3.42
Rebecca Indrio
published
3.40
Alicia Chung
published 3.5
3.40
Debbie Chang
published 3.5
3.39
Lyn Hunter
published
3.35
Janet Daly
published
3.18
Michelle Philpot
published
3.15
Kathleen Maynard
published
3.14
Dawn Nakashima
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kalliope Bellesis + Maureen Mcgrath213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noa Ramo-Larios
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
4.44
4.5
Caitlin Finnell
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.91
Kalliope Bellesis
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Imelda Ho
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Maureen Mcgrath
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Val Swan
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Melissa Abadia
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Alexis Fasteau
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Penny Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Rebecca Indrio
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Alicia Chung
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Chang
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lyn Hunter
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.39
Janet Daly
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Michelle Philpot
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Kathleen Maynard
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dawn Nakashima
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.