Teams

Teays Valley Porter

2025 OH OV FALL Combo Charleston · 2025 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-02vs Greenmont BlakeWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Porter / Maddy Pratt vs Bryanna Button / Priscilla Schade6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElla Peterson / Joan St Clair vs Julie Dubs / Marilyn Moses6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Cook / Hannah Schoolfield vs Tracy Barnes / Anne Chambers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-26vs Greenmont BlakeWon 21
W#1 DoublesElla Peterson / Maddy Pratt vs Tracy Barnes / Dianne Fleming6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSydney Prince / Hannah Schoolfield vs Kathy Wilson / Judy Blake6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Davis / Diana Panucci vs Priscilla Schade / Bryanna Button0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-18vs Greenmont BlakeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaddy Pratt / Melinda White vs Priscilla Schade / Dianne Fleming7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Porter / Mary Cook vs Karen Stauffer / Kathy Wilson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Davis / Diana Panucci vs Tracy Barnes / Judy Blake6-2, 6-0
2025-10-13vs Greenmont BlakeWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Porter / Melinda White vs Dianne Fleming / Priscilla Schade3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSydney Prince / Joan St Clair vs Karen Stauffer / Kathy Wilson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Davis / Diana Panucci vs Julie Dubs / Judy Blake4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Sydney Prince
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Maddy Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Carol Porter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Diana Panucci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Hannah Schoolfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ella Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Joan St Clair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melinda White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Prince + Melinda White213 matchesnot enough data
Sydney Prince + Carol Porter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Prince
47W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.93
Maddy Pratt
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Carol Porter
56W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Diana Panucci
29W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Hannah Schoolfield
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Ella Peterson
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan St Clair
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melinda White
19W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.