Teams

SFV - LLW Racketeers/Liberty Peralta & P Bentley

2025 Mixed 55 SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesDavid Buik / Diep Ho vs Edward Cabrera / Sherry Gordon6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGlen Chester / Jacqueline Hantgan vs Patrick McDuff / Angie Wu6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVictor Holt / Liberty Peralta vs Cobe Crosby / Karen Crosby7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesScott Carrithers / Pamela Bentley vs Mike Garcia / Laurie Patterson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMolly Jackson / Michael Rad vs Chung Mi Ferraro / Ken Green4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobina Markarian / Victor Holt vs Patrick McDuff / Kathi Hendrickson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Aldo Angrisani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Bruce Lilly
published 3.5
3.23
Glen Chester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Diane Audeon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Diep Ho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
David Buik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Scott Carrithers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Molly Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Pamela Bentley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jacqueline Hantgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Robina Markarian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elsie Crowninshield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Liberty Peralta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Rad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victor Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aldo Angrisani
93W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Bruce Lilly
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Glen Chester
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Diane Audeon
48W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Diep Ho
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
David Buik
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Scott Carrithers
13W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Pamela Bentley
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jacqueline Hantgan
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Robina Markarian
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Elsie Crowninshield
31W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Liberty Peralta
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rad
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Victor Holt
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.