Teams

SFV-Double Bypass/C Ferraro & Ken Green

2025 Mixed 55 SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesEdward Cabrera / Sherry Gordon vs David Buik / Diep Ho4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick McDuff / Angie Wu vs Glen Chester / Jacqueline Hantgan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCobe Crosby / Karen Crosby vs Victor Holt / Liberty Peralta6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMike Garcia / Laurie Patterson vs Scott Carrithers / Pamela Bentley4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChung Mi Ferraro / Ken Green vs Molly Jackson / Michael Rad6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick McDuff / Kathi Hendrickson vs Robina Markarian / Victor Holt6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ken Green
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Edward Cabrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Rick Gordon
published
2.74
Angie Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Cobe Crosby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Chris Burston
published 3
2.62
Debbi Dixon
published 3
2.60
Karen Crosby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Kathi Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Sherry Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Monica Gianni
published
2.54
Chung Mi Ferraro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Laurie Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Dan Kollmorgen
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Green + Laurie Patterson6056% gamesnot enough data
Karen Crosby + Cobe Crosby134 matchesnot enough data
Rick Gordon + Sherry Gordon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Green
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Edward Cabrera
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rick Gordon
0W–16L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Angie Wu
7W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cobe Crosby
1W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Chris Burston
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Debbi Dixon
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Karen Crosby
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Kathi Hendrickson
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Sherry Gordon
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Monica Gianni
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Chung Mi Ferraro
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Laurie Patterson
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
2.5
Dan Kollmorgen
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.